uBlockOrigin
Showing with 11 additions and 11 deletions.

+11 −11 Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
diff --git a/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md b/Own-memory-usage:-benchmarks-over-time.md
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-Just a place for me to keep track of comparative memory usage over time. Screenshot before/after [reference benchmark](./Reference-benchmark). Great care taken to ensure memory was garbage collected before screenshots taken. To force memory garbage collection, browser left on idle for more than 1 minute, then dev console of each extension opened, _Timeline_ tab, then clicked twice on the trash can icon.
+Just a place for me to keep track of comparative memory usage over time. Screenshot before/after [reference benchmark](./Reference-benchmark). The memory was garbage collected with great care before taking the screenshots. Forcing memory garbage collection occurred by leaving the browser idle for more than 1 minute, then the dev console of each extension opened, _Timeline_ tab, then clicked twice on the trash can icon.
 
 ### 23 December 2014
 
 - Chromium 39.0.2171.65 64-bit (Linux)
 - uBlock Origin (uBO) 0.8.2.2
 - AdBlock 2.15
-- Adblock Plus 1.8.8
+- Adblock Plus (ABP) 1.8.8
 - Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8
 
 Before benchmark started:<br>
@@ -15,26 +15,26 @@ After benchmark completed:<br>
 ![after](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-20141223-after.png)
 
 Observations during benchmark:
-- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. Whereas uBO consistently show at most low-single digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range.
+- ABP/AdBlock/Adguard are CPU intensive. uBO consistently shows at most low single-digit CPU usage, other blockers are most often showing double-digit CPU usage, and sometimes in the high double-digit range.
 
 Settings:
-- **uBO 0.8.2.2**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch).
+- **uBO 0.8.2.2**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie. (Less memory churning at launch).
 - **AdBlock 2.15**: _AdBlock custom filters_, _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware protection_.
-- **Adblock Plus 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled.
+- **ABP 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled.
 - **Adguard AdBlocker 1.0.3.8**: _English filters_, _Spyware filter_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Social media filter‎_, _Phishing and malware protection_. _Allow acceptable ads_ disabled.
 - Browser's _Click-to-play_ enabled
 - Browser's _Block third-party cookies and site data_ checked
 
 Notes:
 
-- Users should mind [privacy issues](http://adguard.com/en/how-malware-blocked.html#extension) raised when enabling AdGuard's _Malware/phishing protection_.
+- Users should mind [privacy issues](https://kb.adguard.com/en/general/how-malware-protection-works#extensions) raised when enabling AdGuard's _Malware/phishing protection_.
 
 ### 18 September 2014
 
 - Chromium 37.0.2062.94 64-bit (Linux)
 - uBO v 0.6.2.1
 - AdBlock 2.7.13
-- Adblock Plus 1.8.5
+- ABP 1.8.5
 - Ghostery 5.4.0
 - Disconnect 5.18.15
 
@@ -45,15 +45,15 @@ After benchmark completed:<br>
 ![after](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gorhill/uBlock/master/doc/benchmarks/mem-usage-20140918-after.png)
 
 Observations during benchmark:
-- AdBlock is *very* CPU intensive. Adblock Plus also, although to a lesser degree compared to AdBlock.
+- AdBlock is *very* CPU intensive. ABP also, although to a lesser degree compared to AdBlock.
 
 Settings:
-- **uBO v 0.6.2.1**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie (i.e. less memory churning at launch).
+- **uBO v 0.6.2.1**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Peter Lowe's_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, all malware lists (3). Launched with a valid selfie. (Less memory churning at launch).
 - **AdBlock 2.7.13**: _AdBlock custom filters_, _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware protection_.
-- **Adblock Plus 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled.
+- **ABP 1.8.5**: _EasyList_, _EasyPrivacy_, _Fanboy’s Social Blocking List‎_, _Malware Domains_. _Acceptable ads_ disabled.
 - **Ghostery 5.4.0**: _Blocking all trackers_. Ghostrank not selected. _Alert bubble_ disabled.
 - **Disconnect 5.18.15**: Default settings.
 
 Notes:
 
-I chose to not benchmark AdGuard, because of the privacy issues when enabling _Malware/phishing protection_.
+I chose not to benchmark AdGuard, because of the privacy issues when enabling _Malware/phishing protection_.