Does the Night Sky Show Us the Universe in the Past?
Have you ever looked up at the night sky and asked yourself this question? If you are an eager viewer of popular science broadcasts on TV that deal with astrophysics, this would be an easy question for you. The obvious answer, really not a big spoiler, would be:
“Sure, the Moon, planets, stars of the Milky Way and other celestial objects, such as galaxies, reflect or emit light. Light travels at approximately 300,000 km per second in a vacuum. Thus, given the distance to a stellar object, it is easy to figure out how long the light has traveled from the object before it reaches your eyes.”
Take the Andromeda galaxy (M31), for example. It is our neighboring galaxy, and the Milky Way is expected to undergo a close encounter and merger with Andromeda in the near cosmological future, i.e., in roughly 4 billion years. Andromeda is approximately 2.5 million light-years away. Thus, if you watch it with your binoculars in the night sky, you will see it as it was 2.5 million years ago.
At least, this is the conventional account often presented in science documentaries. But is this really the case?
Key Concepts
It is easy to get confused about the different concepts we will talk about.
Thus, we provide some basic definitions to clarify the concepts, but without aiming at full technical precision.
The most important concept to hold in mind is that we assume Einstein’s framework of Special Relativity.
Furthermore, we have to distinguish these concepts:
- Light-travel time: The duration of a photon’s path in a chosen coordinate system. This is what we mean by talking about “the time the light has traveled”. This time is also employed to calculate the speed of light. Because it presupposes a coordinate system, this time is also called coordinate time.
- Lookback time: The difference between cosmic time at emission and cosmic time now, in standard cosmology.
- Photon proper time: This is zero for an ideal light-like path, so it is not meaningful to say that a photon itself “experiences,” for example, 2.5 million years.
- Source age: The age of Andromeda or one of its stars at the photon’s emission event; this is not to be confused with the light-travel time of the photon.
The Two-Way Speed of Light
Obviously, if we know the speed of light, the above conclusion is nearly self-evident. And yes, physicists measured the two-way speed of light in vacuum in many experiments over the past several decades.
The principal setup is like this (see Figure 1):
- Let x₁ and x₂ be two points on a straight line at a distance d.
- Let t_{rt} be the round-trip light-travel time as defined below.
- Place two mirrors, Mirror 1 and Mirror 2, at x₁ and x₂, respectively.
- Position a clock C1 at x₁.
To execute the Gedankenexperiment (“thought experiment”), emit a light beam from x₁. It travels in a straight line to the mirror at x₂, where it is reflected back to the mirror at x₁. Record this round-trip interval t_{rt}, i.e., the round-trip light-travel time, with your clock C1. The measured average speed over the round trip is then
The result is always approxiIt seems the case is closed now.
Get Winfried Dietmayer’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
But look a bit more closely. The physicists didn’t measure the one-way speed of light, only the two-way speed of light. The light beam traveled from x₁→x₂→x₁. This is a closed path: the light returns to its point of departure. For equal outbound (x₁→x₂) and return (x₂→x₁) distances, the measured round-trip speed is the harmonic mean of the two one-way coordinate speeds.
But the light from Andromeda only traveled one way to your eyes. No round trip.
The One-Way Speed of Light
Why not simply measure the time interval t_{ow} for the distance d (x₁→x₂)? To do this, we will need a second clock C2 at x₂ to register the time at x₂. To measure the time interval t_{ow} for the distance d, we must synchronize the clocks C1 and C2. We can do it essentially in two ways.
First Approach: Einstein Synchronization
Assuming that the clocks C1 and C2 are already located in one inertial frame at the positions x₁ and x₂, respectively, measure the round-trip time t_{rt} again. Einstein synchronization assigns the outward and return legs equal coordinate durations, t_{rt}/2. Thus, set the time of clock C2 equal to the time of clock C1 + t_{rt}/2. The clocks are now synchronized, provided that they run at the same rate.
Second Approach: Slow-Clock Synchronization
Start C3 next to C1 with both clocks set equal, then transport C3 slowly to
x₂. Along the way, C3 follows a different worldline and accumulates slightly less proper time than a stationary clock because of time dilation. As the transport speed approaches zero, this proper-time difference approaches zero. In standard special relativity, slow clock transport therefore yields the same synchronization as Einstein’s light-signal convention. It is not an independent, convention-free measurement of the one-way speed of light.
“Measuring” the One-Way Speed of Light
We are now ready to measure the one-way speed of light (see Figure 2).
To execute the Gedankenexperiment, emit a light beam at x₁, register its start time with clock C1, t₁, and do the same at x₂ using clock C2, registering t₂. Then compute the one-way speed, c:
Your result will again be 300,000 km/s. There seems to be no difference at all.
The Catch
What is wrong with this reasoning? For the second Gedankenexperiment (measuring the one-way speed of light), we need synchronized clocks. This synchronization step requires a convention for relating the readings of spatially separated clocks. In Einstein synchronization, one defines the reflection event at x₂ to occur at the temporal midpoint between emission and return at x₁. The result is therefore not an independent empirical measurement of the one-way speed. It follows from the synchronization convention used to define the two distant clock readings.
The Impossibility of Measuring the One-Way Speed of Light
In the standard conventionalist analysis, directly determining a one-way speed requires a convention for synchronizing separated clocks.
Einstein defined a standard way to synchronize spatially separated clocks in an inertial frame. The procedure assigns the reflection event of a round-trip light signal to the temporal midpoint between its departure and return. This convention treats opposite directions symmetrically and makes the laws of special relativity take their familiar isotropic form: light has coordinate speed c in every direction. This means, for our case, that the light speed in direction x₁→x₂ is the same as in the reverse direction x₂→x₁.
Whether this convention is the only physically meaningful definition of distant simultaneity, or instead one empirically equivalent choice among several, is a longstanding philosophical debate. What is not in dispute is that the standard choice is operationally clear, symmetric, and extraordinarily effective.
The Night Sky Revisited
Going back to our example, the Andromeda galaxy, the usual statement that light from Andromeda has traveled for about 2.5 million years uses a standard time-coordinate convention — normally Einstein synchronization —together with an astronomical distance estimate, including measurements based on Cepheid variable stars.
For Andromeda, the two-mirror inertial frame construction is an idealization rather than a literal model: Earth and M31 have relative motion and reside in a weakly curved, expanding spacetime, but these complications do not change the conceptual synchronization issue discussed here.
The round-trip measurement of light speed alone does not independently determine that one-way coordinate duration. If we apply a different time-coordinate convention, the light travel time would be different.
To put it differently, the numerical assertion that the Andromeda galaxy’s observed light took 2.5 million years to reach us is not invariant under a change of distant-simultaneity convention.
Changing the convention would not alter the emission event, the detected radiation, or the causal and astrophysical information that the radiation carries. Those observables remain unchanged.
Conclusion
The answer to the question in the blog post title is:
“Yes: the night sky shows us objects through light emitted at events in our causal past. For Andromeda, standard Einstein-synchronized astronomical coordinates assign the received light a travel time of approximately 2.5 million years.”
There is, however, an important qualifier. The numerical one-way coordinate time assigned to that journey depends on a clock-synchronization convention. The standard convention assigns equal coordinate speeds, c, to the outward and return legs of a round trip. A different convention redistributes the same observed round-trip duration between the two directions while leaving the measured two-way speed unchanged.
This does not alter the emission event, the received signal, and its astrophysical information. It clarifies what is — and is not — contained in the familiar statement that distant astronomy lets us “see into the past.”
Popular-science accounts necessarily simplify astrophysics; here, the simplification can conceal a genuine conceptual subtlety.
