Yuddha-Svara: The Breath at War (part 9 of blog series on Shiva Swarodaya)
Part 9 of a series on the Shiva Swarodaya: battles, messengers and wagers read through the breath, and what they mean for the contests of modern life. Verse numbers follow the ‘Śrī Śivasvarodaya, with Hindi translation by Pt. Mihir Chandra. Khemraj Shrikrishnadas, Shri Venkateshwar Press, Bombay’ 1898–99 edition.
स्वरज्ञानिबलादग्रे निष्फलं कोटिधा भवेत् । इह लोके परत्रापि स्वरज्ञानी बली सदा ॥
svara-jñāni-balād agre niṣphalaṃ koṭidhā bhavet | iha loke paratrāpi svara-jñānī balī sadā ||
Before the strength of one who knows the breath, ten million other strengths come to nothing. In this world and the next, the knower of the breath is always strong. (verse 270)
Part 8 og blog series turned inward, to the length of a single breath. This part turns outward again, to the most surprising chapter in the Shiva Swarodaya: about forty verses on war (230–271), followed by a short coda on the one battle no one wins by force, the battle with death (272–274).
Why does a yoga text have a war chapter? Because it was never only a yoga text. Its readers included kings, generals and their advisers, and the questions they brought were practical ones. When should the army march? From which side should we attack? Will the messenger’s news be good? Who will win? The Swarodaya answers all of them with the same two checks this series has followed since part 4: which nostril is flowing, and which element is in it.
Few readers today will lead an army. But almost everyone fights a few battles a year: a job interview, an exam, a court hearing, a negotiation, a match. Near the end of this post, “The modern battlefield” translates the chapter’s rules into those contests, and separates what has scientific support from what is tradition.
The part 9 chapter uses a few technical words again and again. It helps to have them straight before we start.
Keep jīva and śūnya in mind especially. Almost every verse below says: put the flowing side forward, keep the empty side for the enemy.
Setting out: which breath, which foot, which side
The chapter opens with a rule about distance:
दूरयुद्धे जयी चन्द्रः समासन्ने दिवाकरः । वहन्नाड्यागतः पादः सर्वसिद्धिप्रदायकः ॥
dūra-yuddhe jayī candraḥ samāsanne divākaraḥ | vahan-nāḍy-āgataḥ pādaḥ sarva-siddhi-pradāyakaḥ ||
For a distant war the moon brings victory; for one close at hand, the sun. The foot on the side of the flowing channel, put forward first, gives every success. (verse 230)
The logic fits part 4. The moon breath suits long, steady undertakings; a far campaign is one. The sun breath suits sharp, immediate action; a fight on your doorstep is one. And the foot rule is the one part 4 gave for any journey, here applied to an army.
The element matters too:
भूमौ जले च कर्तव्यं गमनं शान्तिकर्मसु । वह्नौ वायौ प्रदीप्तेषु खे पुनर्नोभयेष्वपि ॥
bhūmau jale ca kartavyaṃ gamanaṃ śānti-karmasu | vahnau vāyau pradīpteṣu khe punar nobhayeṣv api ||
For peaceful missions, set out in earth or water. For fierce ones, in fire or air. In ether, for neither. (verse 234)
Then comes the most important rule of the chapter, the direction of attack:
यां दिशं वहते वायुर्युद्धं तद्दिशि दापयेत् । जयत्येव न सन्देहः शक्रोऽपि यदि चाग्रतः ॥
yāṃ diśaṃ vahate vāyur yuddhaṃ tad-diśi dāpayet | jayaty eva na sandehaḥ śakro ‘pi yadi cāgrataḥ ||
Have the battle fought on the side toward which your breath is flowing. You will win without doubt, even if Indra himself stands before you. (verse 241)
Verse 256 repeats the point: take up your position in the direction of the flowing breath, using the compass from part 7: with the moon breath flowing, stand to the east or north; with the sun breath, to the south or west.
The rest of the preparations are personal:
The messenger: reading news by the breath
In the Swarodaya, a messenger (dūta) is anyone who arrives with a question or a report. The reader does not judge the news by its content. He judges it by his own breath at the moment it is spoken.
The first rule is about the phase of the breath:
श्वासप्रवेशकाले तु दूतो जल्पति वाञ्छितम् । तस्यार्थः सिद्धिमायाति निर्गमे नैव सुन्दरि||
śvāsa-praveśa-kāle tu dūto jalpati vāñchitam | tasyārthaḥ siddhim āyāti nirgame naiva sundari ||
If the messenger speaks of what is wished for while the breath is coming in, the aim is achieved. On the out-breath, never, O beautiful one. (verse 246)
Verse 247 widens it to every question about gain: asked on the in-breath, it succeeds; on the out-breath, it brings loss. This settles a puzzle from part 7. There, verse 206 said success comes with saṅgraha, and we left open whether that meant the in-breath or the meeting of the two breaths. Verses 246–247 state the in-breath rule plainly, which makes “in-breath” the more likely reading of 206 too.
The second rule is about fullness. If a messenger asks about war while the breath is full on either side, there will be no loss; if it is empty, loss is certain (verse 251).
The text also reads the kind of answer from the breath:
The even-and-odd rule for names is the same pattern as the zodiac in part 7: even goes with the moon, odd with the sun.
The most specific prediction in the chapter is a map of injuries. Asked about a wound in battle, the reader names the place from the element:
भूतत्त्वेनोदरे घातः पदस्थानेऽम्बुना भवेत् । ऊरुस्थानेऽग्नितत्त्वेन करस्थाने च वायुना ॥
bhū-tattvenodare ghātaḥ pada-sthāne ‘mbunā bhavet | ūru-sthāne ‘gni-tattvena kara-sthāne ca vāyunā ||
With earth the blow falls on the belly; with water, on the feet; with fire, on the thighs; with air, on the hands. (verse 252)
Verse 253 closes: “so the science of breath reveals five kinds of wound.” Compare the seats of the elements from part 6 (earth in the knees, water in the feet, fire in the shoulders, air at the navel, ether in the head). Water and ether match; the others do not.
Who will win: defender and invader
The chapter’s main verdict depends on which side you are on:
युद्धकाले यदा चन्द्रः स्थायी जयति निश्चितम् । यदा सूर्यप्रवाहस्तु यायी विजयते तदा ॥
yuddha-kāle yadā candraḥ sthāyī jayati niścitam | yadā sūrya-pravāhas tu yāyī vijayate tadā ||
When the moon flows at the time of battle, the defender surely wins. When the sun flows, the invader wins. (verse 254)
This is the moon-sun split of the whole text applied to war. The moon is steady, receptive and staying, so it favours the side that holds its ground. The sun is hot, active and moving, so it favours the side that marches.
The verdicts gathered from the chapter:
Verse 248 adds a three-way rule: for a man his own right nostril is praised, for a woman the left, and at the time of battle, kumbhaka, holding the breath. Three channels, three ways. The best state for combat is neither breath but the held breath.
Wagers, dice and small contests
The same rules scale down from armies to games. Rai’s translation calls this part of the chapter “gambling”, and a few verses do concern dice, but most are about any contest where one side wins.
Some people have the strength of ten, some of a hundred, ten thousand, a hundred thousand, or a whole kingdom. The one who knows the breath has ten million times the strength of a hundred Indras (verse 271). And before that strength, every other strength is fruitless (verse 270)
The last battle: victory over Yama
After forty verses on beating human enemies, Parvati asks the obvious next question:
परस्परं मनुष्याणां युद्धे प्रोक्तो जयस्त्वया । यमयुद्धे समुत्पन्ने मनुष्याणां कथं जयः ॥
parasparam manuṣyāṇāṃ yuddhe prokto jayas tvayā | yama-yuddhe samutpanne manuṣyāṇāṃ kathaṃ jayaḥ ||
You have told of victory when people fight one another. But when the battle with Yama comes, how do people win? (verse 272)
Shiva’s answer is not a tactic. It is a meditation:
ध्यायेद्देवं स्थिरो जीवं जुहुयाज्जीवसङ्गमे । इष्टसिद्धिर्भवेत्तस्य महालाभो जयस्तथा ॥
dhyāyed devaṃ sthiro jīvaṃ juhuyāj jīva-saṅgame | iṣṭa-siddhir bhavet tasya mahā-lābho jayas tathā ||
Steady, let him meditate on the divine, and offer the life-breath as an oblation where the breath meets itself. He gains what he desires, great gain, and victory. (verse 273)
The “meeting of the breath”, jīva-saṅgama, is glossed by Mihir Chandra as kumbhaka, the held breath, the point where in-breath and out-breath stop and join. Offering the breath there is a ritual image: the breath becomes the offering poured into the fire, as in a Vedic sacrifice. Verse 248 already said that in battle the best state is kumbhaka. Now the same state is the weapon against death.
The next verse explains why it works:
निराकारात्समुत्पन्नं साकारं सकलं जगत् । तत्साकारं निराकारं ज्ञाने भवति तत्क्षणात् ॥
nirākārāt samutpannaṃ sākāraṃ sakalaṃ jagat | tat sākāraṃ nirākāraṃ jñāne bhavati tat-kṣaṇāt ||
Get Stellar Sutras’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The whole world of forms arose from the formless. In knowledge, that world of forms becomes formless in an instant. (verse 274)
This echoes verse 141, quoted at the start of part 6: everything comes from the five elements and returns to them, and beyond them is the stainless One. Death is the dissolution of form. Whoever has already, in meditation, let form dissolve back into the formless has nothing left for death to take.
A few verses earlier, the chapter gave a hint of this in martial language:
न कालो विविधं घोरं न शस्त्रं न च पन्नगाः । न शत्रुव्याधिचौराद्याः शून्यस्थं नाशितुं क्षमाः||
na kālo vividhaṃ ghoraṃ na śastraṃ na ca pannagāḥ | na śatru-vyādhi-caurādyāḥ śūnya-sthaṃ nāśituṃ kṣamāḥ ||
Not time in its many dread forms, not weapons, not serpents, not enemies, disease or thieves: none can destroy one who rests in the void. (verse 268)
“The void” here is śūnya, the state of suṣumṇā from part 5, when neither nostril dominates. For worldly action it is the worst moment (verse 255 calls it dangerous in battle). For the yogi it is the safest.
What science says
No one has tested whether nostril dominance predicts who wins a battle. But three of the chapter’s ideas have real modern relatives.
1. The in-breath helps the mind. Verses 246–247 say questions and news on the in-breath succeed, and on the out-breath fail. Two recent studies found that the phase of the breath really does change how well we think.
• Christina Zelano and colleagues (2016) found that people recognised fearful faces faster, and remembered objects better, when they saw them during an in-breath than during an out-breath. The effect held only for breathing through the nose; through the mouth it disappeared. Recordings from inside the brains of seven epilepsy patients showed brain rhythms in fear and memory regions keeping time with nasal breathing.
• Ofer Perl and colleagues at the Weizmann Institute (2019) found that people spontaneously breathed in just before starting a mental task, without being told to. When they solved spatial problems on an in-breath, they did significantly better than on an out-breath.
That is not the same as saying a messenger’s news comes true on the in-breath. But it suggests the old observers noticed something real: the moment of inhaling is a moment of sharper attention.
2. One nostril can shift arousal. The chapter links the sun breath to attack and the moon breath to holding ground. Part 2 covered the forced-nostril studies. One relevant result: Shannahoff-Khalsa and Kennedy (1993) found that breathing through the right nostril raised heart rate more than breathing through the left. A faster, more aroused body suits a charge better than a long defence. The effect is small, and it comes from forced breathing, not the natural cycle.
3. Fighters still time the breath. Verse 248 calls the held breath the best state for battle. Military marksmanship training teaches shooters to fire in the natural pause after an out-breath, when the body is stillest. That is a short pause, not a long kumbhaka, but the principle of acting in the still point is the same.
And the defender does have an edge. The text says the moon breath favours the side that stays. Military thinkers agree on the outcome, for different reasons: Clausewitz wrote in On War that defence is the stronger form of war, because the defender knows the ground and has shorter supply lines.
A safety note on kumbhaka: holding the breath during exertion raises blood pressure sharply. People with heart disease, high blood pressure, glaucoma or a history of stroke, and pregnant women, should not practise breath-holding under strain.
The modern battlefield: interviews, exams and courtrooms
The Swarodaya’s war chapter was written for kings, but its logic is about any contest with two sides and an uncertain outcome. Translate two of its terms and it maps onto modern life surprisingly well.
Step 1: name your role
The chapter’s key distinction is between the sthāyī, the one who stays and holds the ground, and the yāyī, the one who goes out to challenge. Verse 254 gives the moon breath to the first and the sun breath to the second. Verse 230 adds distance: a long campaign suits the moon, a contest close at hand suits the sun. Verse 234 adds the element: earth or water for peaceful missions, fire or air for fierce ones.
Two rules apply in every row. Ether, or both nostrils flowing at once, is the wrong moment to start any contest (verses 161, 255). And the in-breath, not the out-breath, is the moment of success (verses 246–247).
Step 2: what has evidence, and what is tradition
Before using any of this, be clear about which parts stand on what. This matters more for a court date than for a chess game.
So the honest way to use the chapter today is as a ritual of focus: a short, structured routine that slows the body, sharpens attention and stops the mind racing. It should never be used as a forecast that tells you whether to show up.
Step 3: a ten-minute pre-contest routine
What you need: ten quiet minutes beforehand, the closing test from part 1 for checking your nostril, and the switching methods from part 4.
1. Check the breath (10 minutes before). Find which nostril is open. If both are flowing evenly, that is suṣumṇā: use the next steps to settle, and if you can choose your moment, start a few minutes later (verse 255).
2. Match it to your role. Look up your row in the table above. If your open nostril matches, simply note it.
3. If it doesn’t match, shift it gently, or let it go. The text’s own methods are to lie briefly on the side of the nostril you want to close, or to press the open nostril lightly shut for a few minutes (verse 381; part 4). If there is no time or privacy, skip this step. A mismatch is not a verdict.
4. Slow the breath (3–5 minutes). Breathe in for about 5 seconds and out for about 5 seconds, through the nose, without strain. This is the step with the best evidence behind it.
5. Choose your seat if you can. Put the person you are appealing to (the interviewer, the judge, the examiner’s desk) on your flowing side (verses 241, 256). If there is an opponent in the room, such as opposing counsel, the text would put them on your empty side (verse 261).
6. Step in with the flowing-side foot (verse 230). It costs nothing and it marks the start.
7. Let the key question land on an in-breath. As the decisive question is asked, breathe in quietly while you listen, then answer (verses 246–247). This is also simply good practice: a breath before answering slows you down.
8. Use the still point. Before the hardest moment, such as your opening statement, the first serve or turning over the paper, pause for one natural beat at the end of an out-breath, then begin. This is the everyday form of the chapter’s battle kumbhaka (verse 248). Do not hold your breath for long.
Try it yourself: the in-breath reaction test
This experiment tests the chapter’s most testable claim, that the in-breath favours action (246–247), and it adds the flower test from verse 266. You need a partner, about 20 minutes, and no breath-holding.
Set-up
• A 30 cm ruler, a partner, a notebook.
• For the flower test: a small flower or a light petal, and a smooth floor.
• Use part 1’s closing test to find which nostril is open before you start.
Part A: the ruler drop (reaction time)
1. Sit with your forearm on a table and your hand over the edge, thumb and forefinger open about 3 cm apart.
2. Your partner holds the ruler vertically, with the zero mark between your fingers, and drops it without warning.
3. Catch it as fast as you can. Note the centimetre mark where you caught it; a smaller number means a faster reaction.
4. Before each drop, tell your partner silently, by a nod, whether you are mid in-breath or mid out-breath. Your partner waits for the nod, then drops at a random moment within the next two seconds.
5. Do 20 drops on the in-breath and 20 on the out-breath, mixed in random order. Breathe through your nose throughout.
Part B: the flower test (verse 266)
1. Note which nostril is open.
2. Stand still, hold the flower at chest height in front of the middle of your body, and let it go.
3. Note whether it lands to the left or right of centre. Repeat 20 times, checking your nostril every few drops.
Scoring
For the flower test, 15 or more out of 20 on the open side would be better than chance at the usual 5% level (see the table in part 7).
The ruler test has a real chance of showing a small in-breath advantage, given the studies above. The flower test is a genuine open question. Either way, you will have done what no published study has.
Part C: a contest log (over the next few months)
For every real contest you face, such as an interview, an exam, a hearing, a match or a negotiation, add one line to a log:
After 20 or more entries, ask two separate questions. Did outcomes differ when the nostril matched your role? That tests the tradition. Did you feel calmer, and perform better, on the days you did the routine? That tests the practice. The second question is the one most likely to show something, and it is the one that matters on the day.
The old war chapter of the Shiva Swarodaya teaches a simple law. The moon’s breath, cool and steady, belongs to the one who holds the ground; the sun’s breath, hot and restless, belongs to the one who marches out to take it. Words are carried on the breath as well. What is spoken while the breath flows in takes root, and what is spoken while it flows out is carried away, and modern laboratories have found that the mind is sharpest in that inward moment. Yet the text saves its deepest teaching for last: the final battle, the one with death itself, is won not by force but by stillness, in the pause where the breath rests and the mind settles into the quiet between. Our battlefields today are interview rooms, exam halls, courtrooms and negotiating tables, and the old warriors’ counsel still holds there. Do not use it as a fortune to be read. Use it as a ritual of composure: know which side of the field you stand on, slow the breath, listen as you breathe in, and begin from stillness. Whether the open nostril truly decides the victor, no one has yet proved. But the warrior who can steady the breath has already won the first battle, the one within.
Next in the series: part 10 takes the text through the next stretch of verses (275–314): its verses on attraction and on conception, read critically as history, and its forecast for the whole year, read from the breath at the turn of the new year.
Sources
• Śrī Śivasvarodaya, with Hindi translation by Pt. Mihir Chandra. Khemraj Shrikrishnadas, Shri Venkateshwar Press, Bombay, Śaka 1820 / Saṃvat 1955 (1898–99). Verses 230–274.
• Swami Muktibodhananda, Swara Yoga: The Tantric Science of Brain Breathing. Bihar School of Yoga, Munger, 1984.
• Shaktanand, “Shiv Swarodaya: Complete Text”, nirvanasage blog, 2012.
• Ram Kumar Rai, Śivasvarodaya: Text with English Translation. Prachya Prakashan, Varanasi.
• Zelano C, Jiang H, Zhou G, et al. “Nasal respiration entrains human limbic oscillations and modulates cognitive function.” Journal of Neuroscience 36(49), 2016. Summary: Northwestern University.
• Perl O, Ravia A, Rubinson M, et al. “Human non-olfactory cognition phase-locked with inhalation.” Nature Human Behaviour 3, 2019. Summary: Weizmann Institute; paper record.
• Shannahoff-Khalsa DS, Kennedy B. “The effects of unilateral forced nostril breathing on the heart.” International Journal of Neuroscience 73, 1993.
• Carl von Clausewitz, On War, Book 6, chapter 1.
