Beyond Conventional SAST: A New Approach to Securing Apigee API Proxies
How to automate security for Apigee’s native code — a critical blind spot for traditional static analysis tools that could expose your APIs to risks.
Imagine deploying a seemingly secure API, only to discover post-production that a simple misconfiguration in your gateway layer has opened the door to attacks. In 2023 alone, API related breaches accounted for over 40% of web application attacks (source: industryreports). This is the reality for many teams using API gateways like Google Apigee, where conventional Static Application Security Testing (SAST) falls short.
In the world of DevSecOps, SAST is a cornerstone. We rely on powerful tools to scan our code in languages like Java, Python, and Go, catching vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. But what happens when a critical part of our application isn’t written in a conventional language?
The Challenge with API Gateways
This is the challenge with API gateways like Google Apigee. The logic, policies, and security configurations within Apigee proxies and shared flows are defined in specialized XML-based structures. The path-breaking problem is that conventional SAST tools are “Apigee-unaware.” They can’t effectively parse this native code, creating a significant blind spot in our security coverage.
This gap inspired me, as someone working in the API engineering (including API security and DevSecOps) for over over 22 years, to create a solution: a way to automate static analysis specifically for Apigee bundles and integrate it seamlessly into a modern CI/CD pipeline, creating a truly holistic static scanning process.
The Apigee SAST Blind Spot
While your backend microservices might get a clean bill of health from a traditional SAST scanner, the API gateway layer — the very front door to your services — often remains uninspected at a static level. This is where misconfigurations can lead to significant vulnerabilities, such as unauthorized access or data leaks.
The right tool for the job already exists: apigeelint, Google’s own linter for Apigee. It’s excellent at identifying anti-patterns and security issues within Apigee’s XML configurations. However, it’s often used manually or in simple, isolated scripts. It doesn’t, by itself, solve the enterprise-level challenge of automated, integrated, and extensible security scanning.
The Solution: Orchestrating an Apigee-Aware SAST Stage
The uniqueness of my approach is not just using apigeelint, but transforming it from a manual linter into a fully automated, enterprise-grade security gate within a CI stage — while making it extensible for broader workflows.
My solution is a Python-based tool that:
1. Automates apigeelint:
It systematically scans Apigee proxy and shared flow bundles within a codebase.
2. Integrates into CI/CD:
Using Docker, it becomes a portable, plug-and-play step in any pipeline (Jenkins, GitLab, etc.).
3. Provides Extensible Orchestration:
Get Ashish Saha’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
This is the key. The tool is designed to be orchestrated by a framework like Smithy Security. This elevates it from a simple script to a component in a flexible and holistic static scanning workflow.
Instead of living in a silo, this Apigee-specific scan can now be chained with other security analyses. For example, a single CI trigger could launch:
- Our tool to scan the Apigee proxy configurations.
- A conventional SAST tool (like Checkmarx or Snyk) to scan the backend Java microservice.
- A secrets scanner to check for leaked credentials.
Creating a Holistic Security Picture with SARIF
To make this orchestrated workflow truly effective, all findings must be consolidated. My tool supports this by generating reports in the industry-standard SARIF (Static Analysis Results Interchange Format). This means the results from the Apigee scan can be fed into the same security dashboards and platforms as the results from your other SAST tools.
For the first time, a developer or security analyst can see a complete, unified view of static analysis findings across their entire API ecosystem — from the gateway to the backend — all within their existing tools.
Why This Approach is a Game-Changer
This solution bridges a critical gap in the DevSecOps toolchain. It allows organizations to:
- Achieve True “Shift-Left” for Apigee:
Apply the same rigorous, automated security standards to their API gateway configurations as they do to their application code.
- Unify Security Reporting:
Consolidate Apigee-specific findings with results from other security tools into a single pane of glass.
- Create Extensible Security Workflows:
Build comprehensive, multi-tool scanning processes that cover the full technology stack of an API.
By automating a niche but critical analysis and integrating it into a broader, orchestrated framework, we can finally close a dangerous blind spot and build a more secure and resilient API landscape.
I’d love to hear your thoughts — have you encountered similar challenges with Apigee security? Let’s discuss in the comments or contribute to the project. You can explore the project, including the source code and setup instructions, on my GitHub:
