THE DAY WE STILL HAD HOPE

Press enter or click to view image in full size

An imaginary conversation between a father and his son in India, 2050.

2050. India.

The sky was no longer blue.

It had been years since people could comfortably step outside without checking the air quality index. Breathing clean air had slowly become a privilege, something wealthier families could afford through expensive filtration systems installed inside their homes. For everyone else, it was just another daily struggle.

The streets were crowded, but strangely lifeless. Machines had taken over most industries, and nearly 70% of the jobs that once gave people a sense of purpose had either disappeared or been transformed by artificial intelligence. Young graduates spent years collecting qualifications for opportunities that barely existed.

Corruption had become so deeply embedded in everyday life that honesty almost felt like a disadvantage. Crimes were reported every morning, discussed for a few minutes and forgotten by evening. Violence against women, including rape, had become so normalised in public conversations that outrage rarely lasted beyond a news cycle.

People had stopped expecting much from their leaders.

Some had stopped expecting anything from society itself.

Hope wasn't exactly dead. It had simply become an unfamiliar feeling.

It was a Sunday evening. A twelve-year-old boy was sitting in his father's room, going through an old collection of photographs stored in a digital archive.

He stopped at one particular image.

Thousands of young people stood together on a street. Some held placards, others raised their fists. There were different faces, different languages and different expressions, but somehow everyone seemed to be standing for the same thing.

He turned towards his father.

"Papa, what is this? Why were so many people protesting?"

His father looked at the photograph.

For a few seconds, he said nothing.

Then he smiled faintly.

"That, my son, was a time when people still believed things could change."

"Things could change? What do you mean?"

"Come here. Let me tell you something about the generation that came before you."

The generation that refused to remain silent

"You see, back in 2026, things weren't perfect. Not even close.

We had political divisions, religious tensions, unemployment, corruption and countless problems. People were constantly arguing about religion, caste, language, political parties and identities.

Sometimes, it felt like we had forgotten how to be human before becoming representatives of our respective communities.

But something happened.

Students began raising their voices. They had questions about their future, their opportunities and the systems that were supposed to protect them. They were frustrated with the way things were being handled, and they wanted answers.

What started as a student movement gradually became something much bigger.

People from different backgrounds started standing beside one another.

Hindus stood with Muslims. People speaking Kannada stood with people speaking Tamil. Students with different political opinions found themselves sharing the same streets.

And for once, the differences that usually separated people weren't the most important thing.

They had a common concern.

'But Papa, why would someone protest for people they didn't even know?'

His father chuckled.

"That's a beautiful question, son. And perhaps that's something we slowly forgot as we grew older."

When humanity became louder than identity

I remember how strange it felt to witness people coming together despite everything that usually divided them.

Think about it.

A student worried about their future doesn't stop worrying because another student follows a different religion. A young woman demanding safety doesn't become less deserving of justice because she belongs to another community.

Pain doesn't ask for someone's religion before entering their life.

Yet, we spent years allowing these identities to determine how we treated one another.

During those protests, something different happened. People began recognising one another through their shared struggles rather than their differences.

Even slogans and expressions travelled across regional boundaries. Words like Azadi, often associated with particular political movements, found their way into student protest spaces in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.

It made me wonder whether our divisions were sometimes much bigger in our political discussions than they were in our actual human experiences.

"Papa, were they all thinking alike?"

"No, son. And that's the most important part."

They didn't have to agree on everything. They didn't have to follow the same ideology or believe in the same things.

They simply understood that disagreement didn't require hatred.

I wish we had remembered that lesson for longer.

The generation everyone called distracted

People used to make fun of us.

They said our generation was addicted to smartphones, Instagram, reels and meaningless internet arguments. They believed we were too distracted to care about anything beyond ourselves.

And honestly, sometimes they weren't entirely wrong.

But that period revealed another side of our generation.

Social media became a space where students, independent journalists and ordinary citizens shared what was happening. Videos, photographs and personal experiences travelled beyond the streets where the protests began.

People who might never have heard those stories suddenly started discussing them.

Of course, the internet wasn't perfect. Misinformation existed, and not everything we watched was necessarily true.

But we were learning something important.

Technology could be used to distract an entire generation, or it could help that generation question the world around it.

We were still figuring out which one we wanted to become.

The price of having a voice

"But Papa, weren't they afraid?"

His father looked at the photograph again.

"Of course they were."

Behind those photographs were actual people. Students with families waiting for them at home. Young women demanding to be heard. Young men and women who had examinations, responsibilities and ordinary lives outside those streets.

There were disturbing accounts of police violence, tear gas, intimidation and harassment during the protests.

It wasn't a beautiful movie scene where everyone raised slogans and returned home happily.

There was fear. There was uncertainty. There were consequences.

Imagine being eighteen, worrying about your future and deciding to stand up for something you believe in, only to find yourself being treated as a threat instead of someone whose concerns deserve to be heard.

And yet, people came.

Not because they weren't afraid, but because they believed remaining silent would cost them something too.

"Did they win, Papa?"

His father smiled.

"Well, son, not every movement can be measured by who wins and who loses. Sometimes, the importance of a movement lies in the questions it leaves behind."

And then, somewhere along the way, we forgot.

The boy looked at the photograph again.

"Then what happened? If people understood all this, why is our country like this now?"

That question hurt more than his father expected.

He looked outside. The air purifier in the corner was running continuously. Beyond the window, the sky carried the familiar grey colour of another polluted evening.

"That's the difficult part, son."

We had moments of unity, but we didn't always turn those moments into lasting change.

We continued arguing. We continued choosing political loyalty over accountability. We continued treating elections like the only time our voices mattered.

We allowed corruption to become routine. We became accustomed to injustice. We learned to scroll past things that should have made us uncomfortable.

Every tragedy became yesterday's news.

Every promise became another election slogan.

Every question slowly lost its importance.

And somewhere between all those things, we stopped demanding better.

I don't think one protest could have prevented everything that followed. No single generation could have solved every problem. But perhaps we could have done more to protect the things we once believed in.

Perhaps we became too comfortable with accepting less.

A question from the future

"Papa, do you think people will ever stand together like that again?"

His father didn't answer immediately.

He looked at his son, then at the photograph.

"I hope they do."

"But what if nothing changes?"

"Then they must keep questioning."

"What if nobody listens?"

"Then they must make sure their voices aren't forgotten."

The boy remained silent for a moment.

Then he asked:

"Papa, were you there?"

His father smiled.

"I was eighteen, son."

The boy's eyes widened.

"Really? Did you participate?"

His father looked away for a moment.

"I was young. I had opinions, questions and plenty of things I didn't understand. I thought I had all the time in the world to figure things out."

He paused.

"Perhaps that's why I want you to understand something I wish more people had understood back then."

He placed the photograph beside his son.

"You don't have to share someone's religion to understand their suffering. You don't have to speak someone's language to hear their pain. And you don't have to agree with someone's every opinion to stand beside them when something is wrong."

The boy looked at him quietly.

"Before we become anything else, we are human beings."

Before we lose the ability to hope

The evening slowly turned darker.

Outside, another advertisement appeared on a giant digital screen, promising a better future through artificial intelligence. Somewhere, an automated vehicle moved through the traffic. Somewhere else, another news notification appeared and disappeared.

The world had become technologically advanced, but somewhere along the way, we had forgotten that technological progress and human progress weren't necessarily the same thing.

We had machines capable of answering almost every question, yet we struggled to answer some of the most basic ones.

Why should anyone have to fight for dignity?

Why should women have to live in fear?

Why should honesty be considered a weakness?

Why should a person be judged before their suffering is even heard?

And why did it take a protest for people to remember that they belonged to one another?

I don't know what India will look like in 2050. Perhaps it will be better than we imagine. Perhaps some of these fears will never become reality. But I sometimes wonder what future generations will say about the choices we make today.

Will they remember us as the generation that questioned things, or the generation that watched everything happen and slowly became comfortable with it?

I am writing this as someone who was eighteen in 2026. I haven't lived through every political movement, and I don't pretend to understand every decision that shaped this country.

But I know one thing.

I don't want a future where children have to look at old photographs to understand what unity once looked like.

I don't want them to read about humanity as though it were some forgotten historical concept.

And I certainly don't want a father to explain to his son that people once had the courage to hope, as if hope were something that belonged only to the past.

Because perhaps the saddest thing that could happen to a country isn't losing its wealth, its technology or its position in the world.

It's when its people stop believing that things can become better.

And if my generation still has time to change something, I hope we don't waste it.

Because the day we stood together should never become just another photograph in a history archive.

It should become a reminder of what we are still capable of being.