The Marketing Expense a Founder Never Gets an Invoice For
The website designer wants to know whether the headline is approved. The advertising specialist needs a decision about which service to promote. Someone else is waiting for feedback on a social media post.
The founder answers all three.
Later that day, there are customer calls, an issue with a supplier, and a conversation about cash flow. Marketing has taken another piece of the working day, although the invoices for the actual work may be quite modest.
This is an expense that rarely appears in a marketing budget: the founder’s attention.
It’s particularly noticeable in the first year of a business, when people are still figuring out their offer, their customers, and how much they can afford to invest in attracting them.
The founder often has the most complete understanding of the business. Many marketing decisions genuinely belong on their desk. The difficulty begins when almost every operational detail ends up there as well.
The cost of having everyone ask the same person
A freelancer needs feedback. An agency needs priorities. A developer wants to know what the contact form should do. Every request seems small enough to answer quickly.
By the end of the week, the founder may have spent hours switching between tasks that require completely different kinds of thinking.
There is a good reason for some of this involvement. The business owner decides which customers to pursue, what the product can promise, how much risk to accept, and where to invest limited resources.
Once those decisions are sufficiently clear, specialists have a better basis for making the smaller choices within their areas of responsibility.
I have seen how much easier marketing coordination becomes when the people doing the work have access to the same information about the customer, the offer, and the business objectives.
That is one of the recurring themes in my work at Pinpoint and in the way I think about building marketing around the stage a business has reached.
A cheaper supplier can still take more of your time
Imagine comparing two proposals for a new website.
One supplier has a lower fee and expects the client to provide the page structure, copy, images, and detailed feedback throughout development. The other includes some of that coordination in the scope.
Get Andra Ciucescu’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Both proposals may be perfectly reasonable.
The total cost depends on what the business already has, what the suppliers will deliver, and how much time the founder will need to contribute.
For a founder comfortable with writing and digital tools, the first arrangement may work very well. Someone managing a demanding operation may prefer to pay for more support and preserve time for customers, employees, and decisions that require their direct involvement.
Neither choice is automatically better. The calculation becomes more useful when time is treated as a limited resource alongside cash.
I’ve written elsewhere about marketing activity that consumes resources without building enough lasting value. Founder involvement is part of that calculation, especially when repeated approvals and changing priorities keep work from moving forward.
Decide what deserves your attention
A small amount of preparation can reduce the number of questions reaching the founder.
For a campaign, that might mean agreeing on the target customer, the offer, the budget, the main promise, and who is authorized to approve routine adjustments.
For a website, it may mean settling the basic positioning and page priorities before asking a designer to produce several concepts.
These decisions still require thought. Once made, they can support many smaller decisions that follow.
I also think founders benefit from knowing when they need someone to coordinate the marketing work already being done.
For some businesses, that responsibility can sit with an internal employee. Others may need temporary project support or an external marketing director working on a fractional basis, depending on the volume of work and the stage of the business.
The relevant question is how much coordination the business needs and what kind of responsibility the person taking it on can reasonably assume.
What remains on the founder’s desk
A founder will always have decisions that deserve their time. Choosing a new market, changing the business model, committing to a significant investment, or accepting a reputational risk cannot be reduced to a routine approval.
Marketing is more manageable when those decisions are made consciously and the smaller tasks can move forward without constant intervention.
When I look at a marketing plan, I want to understand what it will require from the people involved, including the founder. A modest budget can be a good starting point. It also needs to be realistic about the time, information, and decisions required to make it work.
That is why I think a useful marketing budget should answer one more question: how much of the founder’s attention will this plan consume?
