The Better a Child Performs, the Fewer Career Choices We Give Them
In India, academic success is supposed to open doors. Somewhere along the way, it began deciding which doors a child should walk through.
Imagine two students who score 95% in their board examinations.
One enjoys solving mathematical problems. The other loves writing, debating, and understanding why people behave the way they do.
Both have performed exceptionally well. Both have demonstrated discipline, intelligence, and the ability to learn.
Now imagine their families discussing their futures.
For one, engineering might come up almost immediately. For the other, perhaps medicine, engineering, or another prestigious profession.
But how often does someone pause to ask a more fundamental question?
What kind of work would allow this child to use their abilities in a way they find meaningful?
It is an interesting contradiction. We spend years telling children that education gives them choices. Yet when they perform exceptionally well, we often begin narrowing those choices for them.
The better the marks, the stronger the expectations.
When achievement becomes an instruction
There is nothing inherently wrong with engineering or medicine. Both can be rewarding careers, intellectually demanding and socially valuable.
The problem begins when academic performance is treated as evidence that a particular career must be appropriate.
A child who scores well in Physics has demonstrated an ability to perform in Physics. That is valuable information. But it does not automatically tell us whether the child will enjoy designing machines, conducting research, developing software, teaching science, or pursuing an entirely different field.
Performance tells us something about what a student can do.
It does not, by itself, tell us what they should do.
These are two different questions, but our conversations about education often merge them into one.
Perhaps that happens because marks are easy to measure. Interests are harder to understand. Aptitudes take time to explore. Career possibilities require information that many families may not have.
A percentage appears on a report card. A child’s potential future does not.
So we use the information we have, even when it cannot answer the question we are asking.
The hidden cost of being a good student
Consider what happens when a child is consistently praised for academic achievement.
Get Abhinandan Sarkar’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Over time, they may learn that being good at something is not merely an ability. It is an expectation they must continue to fulfil.
A student who has always been called brilliant may find it difficult to admit that they do not want the career everyone associates with their performance.
They may worry about disappointing their parents. They may fear wasting their potential. They may struggle to distinguish their own ambitions from the future others have imagined for them.
None of this means that every academically successful child is unhappy or that family guidance is harmful. Many students genuinely want to become doctors or engineers.
But there is a difference between choosing a path because it fits you and choosing it because everyone assumes it should.
And from the outside, the two choices can look identical.
Both students may fill out the same application forms. Both may prepare for the same entrance examinations. Both may tell their families that they have a plan.
We may never know whether one of them quietly abandoned a possibility they had never been encouraged to explore.
What should academic success actually buy a child?
Perhaps the real purpose of academic excellence should be to expand a student’s possibilities.
Good marks can help a child qualify for courses, scholarships, and opportunities. They can give a family more options to consider.
But the final decision should involve more than the score.
What does the child enjoy learning about? What kinds of problems do they want to solve? What working environments might suit them? What does the family understand about the available careers? What remains unknown?
These questions are not an argument against ambition. They are an attempt to make ambition more informed.
A child should not have to perform poorly before being permitted to consider an unconventional future.
Nor should they have to perform exceptionally well to earn the right to choose a conventional one.
Perhaps we need to reconsider what we mean when we say a child has great potential.
Is potential the ability to succeed in the career society already respects?
Or is it the possibility of discovering a path that genuinely fits the individual?
If academic success is supposed to give children more choices, why do we so often use it to make the choice for them?
I have been exploring this larger question in the context of Indian education, including why academically successful children so often seem destined for engineering or medicine.
