Cheers to Hypocrisy: A New Year’s Guide to Unequal Judgment and Selective Outrage
Here, then, is the truth: we are a people who celebrate and condemn in the same breath, our revelry punctuated by the sharpened edges of judgment. As another year shuffles awkwardly into being, trailing glitter and regret, we look to the familiar tableau — men stumbling home with grins askew, women doing the same, but bearing the weight of something heavier. The spotlight is unkind, the script pre-written. Boys will be boys; women will be warned.
The night offers no sanctuary for her. Each step she takes becomes a performance in the public square. Her laughter is dissected, her choices eviscerated. And the man? He vanishes into the folds of forgettable normalcy, his revelry excused as though it were his birthright. It is the same act, isn’t it? But see how the act unravels differently. He emerges unscathed; she wears the bruise of society’s disdain.
The media feeds on this imbalance, its appetite for spectacle insatiable. Women become stories, not people. Their faces beam out from screens and pages, stripped of privacy, their right to vanish denied by the lens. Men, too, stumble into these moments, but their faces are blurred, anonymized, forgiven. Why the disparity? Does a woman’s stumble cut deeper into our fragile morality? The Constitution speaks of privacy, but its words are whispers drowned in the roar of judgment. Article 21, crumpled and cast aside, watches as the spectacle unfolds.
The judgment lingers long after the headlines have faded. For women, this is not a night survived; it is a sentence. Careers falter, relationships crumble, and the self — the irreplaceable core of dignity — shrinks under the weight of public disdain. Nothing digital is ever truly gone, after all. Nothing unforgiving ever truly sleeps. What begins as a moment of celebration calcifies into a warning: you may live, yes, but not too loudly, not too freely. Young women absorb this like ink into paper, their boundaries drawn not by choice but by fear.
Get Indu Suresh’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
And what of moral policing? A benevolent fiction, they’ll say — a way to keep society upright. But how skewed it is, this posture of guardianship. Men stumble into vice and emerge as rogues, lovable or pitiable. Women stumble, and the world tilts, demanding penance. Virtue clings to women as an anchor; men, meanwhile, are free to drift. Policing, when unevenly applied, is not morality at all — it is control.
And control breeds silence, and silence breeds complicity. If judgment must exist, let it be fair. If virtue must matter, let it matter equally. Or better yet, let us ask: why must it matter at all? Imagine a world where the moral gatekeepers laid down their whistles, where empathy stood watch instead. Imagine, not a utopia, but a landscape where laughter, even reckless, is not a crime.
But the media — the vaunted fourth estate, the keeper of democracy’s soul — must act first. To wield power is to bear its burden. Let them trade spectacle for substance, ethics for exploitation. Let them question, gently, what they now judge so harshly. Respect is not so costly; truth need not glitter to hold its worth.
And as for us, the watchers, the sneerers, the clucking tongues in the wings: what are we to make of this endless need to condemn? Reflect, if you can, not to dismantle the celebrant but to understand her. To see her, not as an object to be shamed or a story to be told, but as a person — a person who erred, perhaps, but no more than you have, in your quieter, less visible ways. Is this not the essence of being human: to stumble, to reach, to wish for joy, even fleeting?
Ah, but to wish is to risk. And to risk, it seems, is not her right. Is that what we are to learn? That freedom, that fleeting glimpse of abandon, is a luxury reserved for men? Perhaps, then, we have misunderstood freedom altogether. For what good is it, this great emancipatory promise, if half the world must tread so lightly upon it?
So, here we are: the new year, the old weight. And us, grappling with our own hypocrisies, too timid to name them outright. But perhaps this is the moment to begin. To party, yes, but also to see. To forgive. To blur the lines between judgment and joy until neither one knows quite where the other begins.
