Individualized Tutoring Should Change the Next Lesson | Tiny Orange
A subject gives us a place to begin. A learner’s thinking shapes what comes next.
By Kara Olivarria, M.Ed. Certified Educator and STEM Subject Matter Expert
“We meet students where they are.” Excellent. Where, exactly? And what changes after we get there?
For a parent looking for a tutor, the useful answer is concrete. What will the teacher notice? What will they try? If the first explanation does not help, what happens next?
Individualized tutoring should be visible in those decisions.
The wrong answer is the beginning of a question
Imagine two learners working on 3(x + 2) = 18. Both submit an incorrect answer.
One writes 3x + 2 = 18. That gives me a reason to investigate how they understand multiplication across a grouped expression. Another correctly writes 3x + 6 = 18 but loses track of the steps that follow. I need to find out whether the issue is equality, arithmetic, keeping track of written work, or something else.
These are hypotheses to check with the learner, not diagnoses delivered by a red pen.
Giving both students twenty more equations might produce more information. It might also produce twenty more opportunities to practice the same misunderstanding. Quantity is certainly available. Understanding requires a closer look.
For one learner, the next lesson might use three physical groups of “one unknown and two units.” For another, it might use a balance model or a clearer way to organize each operation. Then we check a new example and ask the learner to explain what changed.
A starting point should not become a permanent address
Get Kara Olivarria’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
My Recursive Skip Logic framework treats each attempt as information for the next instructional decision. The route can move toward a prerequisite, a different representation, a connection across subjects, or a more challenging idea. It can also return to an earlier question with better information.
“Recursive” means we revisit the decision using what we have learned. “Skip” does not mean leaving a hole and hoping future algebra politely ignores it. It means choosing a justified route rather than treating page order as an educational law.
The destination can remain specific: explain equivalence, solve equations independently, or prepare for an upcoming assessment. The route remains open to revision.
Access is part of the lesson
A learner might explain a relationship aloud before they can organize it on paper. Reading demands, task initiation, sensory conditions, or the effort of keeping several steps in mind may affect what an assignment lets them show.
These possibilities can matter for learners with ADHD or autism, but a label does not tell me which support a particular person needs. I still have to ask, observe, and check. A diagram is an option to test, not a lifetime assignment to the “visual learner” department.
Social-emotional learning can also belong inside tutoring: recognizing frustration, asking for a different explanation, setting a goal, or reflecting on progress. These are educational supports. Students should not have to perform confidence before they are allowed to understand something.
What that looks like at Tiny Orange
Tiny Orange offers virtual tutoring and in-person options in the greater Phoenix area when location and scheduling allow. We begin with a learning questionnaire and a free 30-minute initial video consultation. Families can share goals, work samples, questions, and relevant context they feel comfortable providing.
We discuss what success would look like before agreeing on paid support. If Pre-Algebra Beginnings fits the learner’s needs, its downloadable book gives us a shared starting resource alongside the tutoring included in that purchase. The lessons develop as we learn more.
A useful question to ask any tutor is: “What would make you change the next lesson?”
I want to be able to answer it with something we noticed about the learner.
Start a conversation: https://www.tinyorange.co/contact.html
Read the underlying Recursive Skip Logic model: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12768.24321
