The Day I Stopped Measuring Success by the Exam Table
An Early Assumption I Did Not Question
Early in my career, I judged a surgery by what I saw at the follow up visit. Did the anatomy look right. Was the repair holding. Had the prolapse stayed reduced. If the exam looked good, I counted the case a success and moved on.
That assumption felt reasonable. It is also incomplete, and it took me a few years of patient conversations to understand why.
What the Exam Does Not Capture
A woman can have a technically perfect repair and still feel like something is wrong. She might still avoid long car rides, still worry about leaking at the gym, still feel less like herself than she did ten years earlier. None of that shows up when I look at tissue. It shows up when I ask her how her week actually went.
I remember a patient whose anatomic result was close to ideal. By every measure I had been trained to care about, the surgery worked. But she came back quieter than before, still declining invitations, still checking where the bathroom was before she left the house. The repair had succeeded. Her life had not changed much. That gap stayed with me.
The Shift in How I Define a Good Outcome
I changed what I count as a win. Now the anatomic result is one piece of information, not the whole verdict. The questions that matter more are simpler: Can she sit through a movie without thinking about her bladder. Has she gone back to the activities she gave up. Does she feel like the surgery gave her something back, or just gave her a different set of things to manage.
Get Dr. Nathan Guerette’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
This changes how I talk with patients before we ever discuss an operating room date. I ask what she has stopped doing because of her symptoms. I ask what she wants to get back, specifically, not generally. A vague goal like “feel better” is hard to measure against. A specific one, like walking the dog without planning the route around bathrooms, gives both of us something concrete to aim for and to check later.
What I Do Differently Now
I spend more time before surgery on expectations than I used to. If a patient’s real goal is something surgery is unlikely to restore, I say so before we schedule anything. Better to adjust the plan early than to have a technically sound result that misses what she actually came in for.
I also rely more on nonsurgical options as part of the full picture, not as a waiting room before “real” treatment. Pelvic floor therapy, behavioral changes, and conservative management often move the needle on daily quality of life in ways that show up nowhere on an exam table. Treating those as secondary was its own mistake, one that came from the same habit of trusting the visual result over the lived one.
Follow up looks different too. I ask about function, not just appearance. How is sleep. How is confidence in public. How does she feel about her body now, compared to before. These are not questions with a tidy clinical scale, but they tell me more than almost anything I can see or feel on exam.
The Larger Lesson
None of this means anatomy does not matter. A poor repair causes real problems, and getting the structural work right is still the foundation of everything else. But structure was never the whole goal. It was always a means to something harder to measure: a woman feeling like her body is hers again, without having to think about it all day.
I was trained to look. I had to learn to ask. The second one turned out to matter more.
