Mother of All and Nothing
Time to go into the dark
where the night has eyes
to recognise its own.
There you can be sure
you are not beyond love.
The dark will be your womb
tonight.
The night will give you a horizon
further than you can see.
You must learn one thing.
The world was made to be free in.
Give up all the other worlds
except the one to which you belong.
Extract from ‘Sweet Darkness’ by David Whyte
In daring to write about the alchemical journey of transformation, which I have explored and referenced broadly in previous essays, the core topic of “nothing at all” features repeatedly. As best I can, I have tried to creatively communicate the importance, essence, sensations, feelings, thoughts, and philosophy that arise around this core discovery and uncovering of the void at the very centre of what we consider ourselves to be.
Today, however, I want to address the inadvertent impression that there is any permanence, continuity, or enduring quality that can be attributed to “nothing at all”. This is not so. Continuity, unfolding, and consistency exist exclusively within material time. “Nothing at all” does not occupy any location within the material or time-bound realm, and therefore it has neither a trajectory nor a duration to conclude. “Nothing at all” is a totality and does not need or fit into time, which means beginning, duration
and end.
In time, the fullness of a purpose cannot be released all at once.
Duration is the medium that allows a “something” to express completeness through the succession of its latent and actual potential. Only through the sequential stages of birth, tension, flowering, and dissolution can the self-contained energy of a purpose spend itself completely, finally exhausting its necessity within time.
Consequently, any reference to what this void is when encountered
within one’s self-structure remains merely a proposition, a reflective interpretation, and an association with what that encounter provokes in the body-mind across time.
I know that what I am discovering is not merely an individual, personal metamorphosis; it is a universal unfolding open to all, though by no means guaranteed. I know this with quiet conviction through ongoing and rigorous study, observation, dialogue, and deep listening, supported by decades of close sharing up to the present with others who are engaged in this same inquiry, albeit in their own unique ways.
“Nothing at all”, through the limits of mind, feeling, psychology, thought, and language, is simply an attempt to offer a finger pointing at a moon, directed towards something that cannot inherently be pointed to. Recently, I discovered another dimension to this nothingness, which may appear entirely contradictory and paradoxical to previous expressions. Yet paradox is the very nature of this inquiry into the truth of who we are.
While we unambiguously can recognise ourselves to be that void, we cannot fully articulate what this is. We cannot see, taste, touch, think, or express directly this core of our being, yet if we can only approximate it in language, we can improve this rendering by following the inherent impulse of our natural inquiry itself, as our directional point of view naturally seeks added precision and coherence.
Past reflections upon “nothing at all” have had their value, but that phase is changing through the natural rhythm of life, which always gives way to the unforeseen and unexpected. “Nothing at all” remains utterly untouched by anything I or anyone else can ever say about it. It is untouchable, yet it is who we are. We can know both of these realities simultaneously without contradiction.
Out of “Nothing at all” the Mother appears, the Mother, it seems, of All and Nothing.
The Mother is synonymous with “nothing at all”. Yet there is a profound qualitative difference between an abstract nothingness which sounds empty and stark, like a cold night in the infinite expanse of a universe where stars are separated by millions of light-years and what is actually discovered within our attention when liberated from the mundane agency driving the politics of personal identity. We imagine a barren void, but “nothing at all” is not that. It contains, and is, the causal source of everything. Everything rests entirely in the hands of this source.
Recently this unexpected visitor arrived, bringing a profound sense of benevolence that I can only equate, through the paltry limitations of language, to a mothering quality of considerable quiet force. This Mother cannot be seen, tasted, touched, explained, understood, or possessed; nonetheless, this Mother appears divine and is the source and caretaker of everything that exists. I am called to, visited, dismantled and loved all at once by this force. And now I begin to understand those traditions that revere and surrender to Her as the primary ontological power, the central mystery of the Divine Mother.
There is this apparent and surprising “something” arising from this “nothing at all”. How extraordinary it is to realise that we are being held; that the Divine Mother sustains, supports, watches over, and yet leaves us entirely alone. In truth, within the material, time-bound universe, we are orphans. We are orphans precisely because we believe we are “someone”. Yet because in reality we are inherently nothing, we live as though motherless and fatherless until this confusion is unravelled and more fully understood.
Get Patrick Bryson’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
“The Mother” is the most potent way to name the quality, in human terms, that arises from and resides within this void. It is simply the profound love that underpins all things, as experienced through our human senses which are none other than aspects of a directional point of view. We are after all feeling entities embedded in time and form. The human form evolves to function as the instrument through which love recognises itself. The Mother reveals herself when she deems it time, remaining invisible, an unseen presence whose caretaking is absolute, yet who is never met face-to-face. It is indeed as if we are eternally falling backwards into her lap.
This, too, is what “nothing at all” is. It is an utter paradox, but no more so than the miracle of existence itself and the impossibility that anything exists at all. To recognise that everything rests within the lap of the Divine Mother is deeply reassuring, yet it demands that we surrender the illusion that we are a distinct “someone”, that we possess knowledge, or that there is an object we must endlessly seek. When that seeking is abandoned, the Mother of all reveals herself through nothing at all.
This Mother appears, it now seems, when the erotic nature of existence has calmed its fiery demands. Eros is that driving compulsion that directs all things and forces within time. The attraction of Eros is generated by the necessary “twoness” of form and time: the infinite attraction of something and nothing towards their source. This is the pure duality of the erotic, which is experienced and expressed as an octave within the human form as sexual attraction, desire, longing, and union.
If we can face the extraordinary, compulsive demand of our erotic nature upon our attention without fear or avoidance, and with radical acceptance, then we can participate in a powerful alchemy. The somatic and psychic momentum of the self, with its desires, its protective contractions, its erotic fixation, all takes place in time. It has a remarkable physical inertia and dynamism, even whilst it supports and underpins an illusion.
We find that the only protection or coherence in daring to face the fullness of our erotic nature is through surrendering to the reality of nothing at all, which is both a death and a birth. Eros without Thanatos is an unsustainable path and anyone who depends on Eros alone will find themselves eventually divorced and orphaned, until eventually having to face the missing reality of Thanatos - its partner and opposite.
Eros is the Mother’s outbreath and kinetic face in form, whereas Thanatos is her inbreath, her apophatic face. The orphaned self in ignorance desperately attempts to hoard Eros while fleeing Thanatos. The alchemy is triggered when we stop through the realisation that they are inseparable aspects of the same dynamic polarity.
This is a most demanding form of yoga: to come to terms with Eros moving within, below, above, and behind all of our defensive self-assumptions. This lays us bare before a force that we cannot possibly control or manipulate, exposing the vanity of our self-identity - the foolish belief that we are able to modify or master something so primal.
This is the law of Eros and Thanatos: that everything exists within the constellation and coincidence of opposites that underpins all of the forces at play within ourselves and within the material, time-bound world. Is it any wonder that those of us who prioritise and elevate the relevance of Eros in isolation can so often end up lost, confused, and ultimately abandoned by that which we held so dear?
The sequence within this yoga of surrender, which leads to the calming of Eros, works as an organic consequence of meeting the force of the erotic within us without supporting the defensive mechanics of egoic commentary and action. This is the way, rather than setting up an impossible prerequisite condition which the seeker must engineer through attempting to modify themselves. Within the real illusion of time, this process of simply looking directly at Eros feels like an unbearable, demanding discipline, yet it remains possible for any earnest inquirer with an undefended disposition to progress through an honest attitude and approach.
In order to engage in this yoga, it does not truly matter whether we choose celibacy, Tantra, any other documented soteriological path or our own. These choices are far less important than the direct understanding of nothing at all. Nonetheless, some working knowledge of the freedom of renunciation is valuable, just enough to loosen compulsion, but never so much that we construct a pious identity around it. The revelations of renunciation are not just found in the performance of ‘giving something up’ but equally in the fullest engagement.
This is not to prioritise forms of monastic moral virtue as such, but to highlight how conscious abstinence and full engagement can provide the practical opportunity to discover how attention is decoupled from somatic momentum. Ideally, we will be able to embrace all avenues of experiential inquiry, supported by philosophical rigour and non-material spiritual sense-making.
This integration allows us to consummate the full arc of human understanding, spanning abstinence and engagement, loss and fulfilment, separation and union, which our body-mind was built to accommodate. Without a broad and courageous exploration of our sexuality and our humanity, lingering and unconscious power calls upon us will inevitably remain, clamouring to capture our attention. These need to be seen into and seen through.
We neither can nor need to satisfy every earthly longing, but a thorough examination of our erotic nature is essential for what follows. It is the indispensable opening that prepares us for what arises out of access to the conceptually unknowable dimensions of who we already are. A tremendous amount of collective and individual wrongdoing, error and stagnation can be traced back to the domain of the erotic.
A fullness of experiential understanding protects us against a sterile, premature transcendence, where the seeker uses “nothing at all” to overlook unexamined psychological or erotic drives. Such evasion is merely an effective extension of the dilemma of identity that evolution protects by design. Here we find alignment with the sage Sri Aurobindo, whose critique of the purely ascetic illusion - what he famously termed the “Refusal of the Ascetic” - insists that the lower nature must be brought entirely into the light of liberated attention rather than suppressed, where it will inevitably continue to cause confusion.
What we are seeking here is a deep, fulfilled and heartfelt grounding in the fundamental reality of True Absence, its ontologically foundation within the kaleidoscopic matrix of a spiritual life.
From the reality of True Absence, nothing was ever owed, nobody is paying a price, and nothing was ever withheld. In this realisation, which is not a separation but an integration of order, the paradox of embodiment is provided with a liberating context, allowing our capacity of attention to remain undefended and free.
This is what enables the transition into the arms of the Mother. Then Eros resolves back to its source, through the spiritual rhythm of the coming
and going of all things, into the womb of the Divine Mother. Now we understand that Eros does not mean love. Eros is the force of attraction that dynamically runs through all of existence. Love is born and found when the attraction meets itself in the unmerited reality of the Divine Mother. She is revealed as already present once our attention is fully mature, receptive, released, and available.
23 September 2026
