Life Isn’t Binary. Freedom Isn’t Free. And the Cost Is Real.
Most of the time, life doesn’t hurt because it’s hard.
It hurts because it gets reduced.
You’re standing inside something messy and living — fear, hope, pressure, pride, fatigue, love, doubt — all at once. Then someone looks at you and asks a question like you’re a form:
JEE or NEET?
Science or commerce?
Mom or dad?
Stay or leave?
And suddenly you feel it: the quiet violence of being forced to become simple.
Not because you can’t choose.
Because choosing from a fake menu feels like losing yourself either way.
And when you grow up, you realize something darker: those menus weren’t made for truth. They were made for legibility.
The part people don’t say out loud
When someone pushes a binary at you, they’re not only asking for a decision.
They’re asking you to make your life legible.
Pick a box so they can relax.
Pick a label so they can explain you.
Pick a path so they don’t have to sit with your uncertainty.
Pick something respectable so their anxiety goes down.
And if you don’t pick quickly, they don’t call it a process.
They call it failure.
That’s why binaries feel suffocating. They don’t just limit options. They put shame on complexity.
Inside, it’s never 0 or 1
Inside, it’s not binary. It’s mixed-state.
It’s:
- “I want this, but I’m scared.”
- “I can do it, but I’m tired.”
- “I love them, but I can’t breathe here.”
- “I want to make my family proud, but I don’t want to disappear.”
- “I want the future, but I also miss peace.”
You’re not confused. You’re human.
But people call it confusion because they can’t tolerate a mixed state. They want clean stories. They want you to be one word.
Your body already proves life isn’t a switch
Stress builds like a slow leak.
Sleep debt stacks quietly.
Resentment grows without a sound.
Then one day you snap, and everyone calls it “sudden.”
It wasn’t sudden. It was ignored.
A nerve doesn’t “kind of fire.” It fires when it crosses a threshold.
A person doesn’t “kind of break.” They break when enough has accumulated.
This is one of the most unfair parts of life: the world judges you by the moment you collapse, not by the months you were carrying weight silently.
So yes — life feels analog. It moves in gradients.
But it also flips. It crosses thresholds. It collapses.
The quantum part (without pretending to be a physics lecture)
Before you choose, you exist in multiple futures at once.
Not in a mystical way. In a real way.
Different branches are open:
- one path that looks safe
- one path that looks meaningful
- one path that makes parents proud
- one path that makes you feel alive
- one path you don’t even know how to name yet
Until you act, those branches are live possibilities.
Then action “measures” you.
You submit the form.
You choose the stream.
You accept the seat.
You say yes.
You say no.
You move.
And in that moment, possibilities collapse into a visible reality.
But collapse isn’t destiny.
It’s a branch.
You can re-branch later. Switch later. Merge later. Restart later.
What you can’t undo easily is what happens in your head when you treat the branch like a verdict.
The real trap is not the decision. It’s the identity you get forced into.
Binary decisions happen. You do have to act.
But what destroys people is what comes after.
They turn a decision into a permanent judgment:
- “I chose science, so that’s who I am.”
- “I didn’t clear it, so I’m not that person.”
- “I’m a topper, so I’m not allowed to fall.”
- “I’m loyal, so I must tolerate.”
That’s when the box stops being temporary and becomes a cage.
A category is compression. It throws away detail so systems can run faster.
A form needs that.
A human doesn’t.
And here’s the brutal line that is unfortunately true:
When you start living like paperwork, you start dying slowly.
JEE vs NEET is the cleanest example — but the real story is bigger
“JEE or NEET” is not life. It’s two doors society recognizes.
It’s two outcomes that are easy to understand, easy to respect, easy to explain to relatives.
But life has more doors than what people respect:
commerce, diploma, law, design, research, entrepreneurship, defense, trades, switching later, restarting later.
The world doesn’t mention these first because they’re not the default prestige story.
That’s why this binary is so heavy. It isn’t just academic.
It’s social judgment disguised as guidance.
And it creates a fear people rarely admit:
“If I don’t choose what’s respected, I’ll be seen as less.”
That fear has ruined more lives than failure ever did.
Now the personal part: why this binary hurts me in a specific way
For a long time, I thought I was lucky.
Not in a shallow way. In a real way.
I had backing. My parents stood behind me. I could explore, experiment, break things, try again. My father and mother didn’t have that kind of backing when they were my age. They had to pick early and survive inside tight constraints.
So when they supported me, I took it as permission to live wider.
And I did.
I explored more than I built. I tested more than I settled. I chased curiosity more than certainty.
Get Prakul Hiremath’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
At first, freedom felt like air.
Now it sometimes feels like drowning.
Because as you grow older, freedom stops feeling like “anything is possible” and starts feeling like:
If you become nothing, it’s on you.
That’s the hidden cost of having options. Options don’t just give you possibility. They demand responsibility.
Not responsibility to your parents.
Responsibility to yourself.
I thought my state-space was infinite. It wasn’t.
In my head, life looked limitless.
But slowly I started noticing an invisible wall.
Not a literal wall. A wall made of defaults:
- what society respects
- what families understand
- what looks safe
- what sounds employable
- what makes elders stop questioning you
- I thought I was choosing freely.
But many of my choices were pre-chosen by the environment.
After high school, taking science felt “obvious.” Not because I deeply decided it. Because the world treated it like the default. Almost like opting out wasn’t a real option.
After science, engineering felt like the next default. Again, not even a debate.
It’s not that engineering is bad. It’s powerful. It runs in my veins too. I can feel that.
But it disturbed me to realize: I didn’t only choose engineering.
I was also moved into it — like a current moves you if you don’t swim hard in another direction.
The bigger machine: why “default engineering” became a culture
At some point I started seeing a larger structure.
The West spent centuries building foundations: research culture, deep science, long-term labs, institutions that allow people to think for years before producing “results.”
A lot of countries like ours became the workforce layer of that machine.
Not because Indians are less creative. Not because engineers are “slaves.” That’s not the point.
The point is: systems incentivized a specific outcome.
Produce engineers. Produce coders. Produce workers who execute.
So it became normal that “everyone becomes an engineer.” Not because every child naturally wants that, but because the pipeline is built that way. It’s legible. It’s safe. It’s respected. It’s employable.
Once a pipeline becomes a culture, it starts to feel like destiny.
It also carries silent biases: the “default” path gets assigned differently based on gender, background, money, family expectations. Defaults always pretend to be neutral while guiding millions.
The shift: I don’t want the normal map
Here is what changed in me:
I’m not trying to escape engineering because I hate it.
I’m trying to stop living inside a path chosen for clarity, not for truth.
Engineering can be a tool in my hands. But my “area to hunt” isn’t the broad highway. It isn’t the standard ladder. It’s a narrower path. Less walked. Harder to explain. More personal. More risky. More real.
This is where life stops being binary for me.
It’s not “engineering or not engineering.”
It’s “engineering as a job label” versus “engineering as a tool for my own direction.”
And now the real conflict: my parents don’t recognize the dictionary
My parents aren’t happy.
Not because they want to control me like villains. It’s simpler than that.
Their dictionary of a good life is built from survival and clarity. They want a path they can name, explain, and trust.
My new direction doesn’t sit neatly in their dictionary.
So to them, it looks like I’m drifting.
To me, it feels like I’m finally steering.
That gap creates tension.
And it hurts in a specific way, because I’m not fighting strangers.
I’m fighting the people who gave me the freedom I’m now using differently than they imagined.
The emotional truth: you’re not afraid of choosing — you’re afraid of losing meaning
Most people aren’t scared of hard work.
They’re scared of working hard and being told it doesn’t count.
They’re scared of making a choice and later hearing:
“You wasted time.”
“You didn’t take the right path.”
“You could have been something else.”
“You’re behind.”
So they cling to “safe” choices, not because they love them — because they fear shame.
And the most painful part is this:
Sometimes you’ll choose the respected path and still feel empty.
Because the path was never the problem.
The self-erasure was.
So what do you do when life gives you two doors?
You stop treating doors like destiny.
You ask better questions; not to escape commitment, but to escape false imprisonment.
- What’s the third option no one is saying out loud?
- What part of this is reversible?
- What’s the smallest next step instead of the final decision?
- What’s building up inside me that I’ve been ignoring?
- What would I choose if nobody was watching?
These questions don’t remove pressure. They remove delusion.
They let you act without turning one step into a lifetime label.
The ending: what I’ve learned about freedom
I used to think freedom meant “do anything.”
Now I think freedom means something harsher:
Choose one thing, and take full responsibility for it — even when no one claps, even when it’s not legible, even when your own parents don’t understand the language.
That’s independence.
And maybe that’s what growing up actually is:
Not getting more choices.
But learning to carry the weight of the choices you keep.
Because life isn’t binary.
It’s analog drift, hidden accumulation, threshold flips, and constant branching.
Deadlines will force you to pick a door.
Just don’t mistake the door for your identity.
Don’t let a system’s need for simplicity become the story of your life.
