The Strength to Care
Why the strongest man in the room may not be the one you think
There is a particular kind of man we have come to recognise as strong.
He is physically imposing, emotionally impenetrable, fiercely independent and apparently indifferent to what anyone thinks of him. He doesn't apologise. He doesn't complain. He doesn't tolerate weakness. He doesn't give a fuck.
Or so he tells us.
It's an appealing image, particularly to young men trying to establish their place in the world. It promises freedom from insecurity, rejection, humiliation and the exhausting uncertainty of human relationships. Become strong enough, the story goes, and nothing will be able to touch you.
But I've increasingly come to wonder whether we've mistaken the performance of strength for strength itself.
Because there is something remarkably easy about not caring.
You don't have to understand anyone. You don't have to consider their needs. You don't have to confront the possibility that you might be wrong. You don't have to invest yourself in something that might disappoint you, or love someone who might hurt you.
You can simply withdraw. Dismiss. Dominate. Walk away.
Indifference can look like power precisely because it relieves us of so many of the demands of being human.
And perhaps that is where we've got masculinity backwards.
The Appeal of the Unbreakable Man
I understand the attraction of toughness.
I've spent much of my life interested in physical capability, in discovering what the body can do, in pushing against the limitations we impose upon ourselves. There is something deeply satisfying about undertaking a difficult physical challenge and discovering that you're capable of more than you imagined.
The discipline of training. The discomfort of effort. The gradual acquisition of strength. The extraordinary feeling of doing something today that seemed impossible six months earlier.
These experiences have value beyond appearance, competition or achievement.
There is joy in becoming capable.
And there is something compelling about the heroic ideal: the person who confronts overwhelming difficulty, refuses to surrender and discovers meaning in the struggle itself.
I don't believe we should apologise for finding that inspiring.
Nor do I believe that the masculine desire for strength, courage, independence or achievement is inherently problematic.
But there is a question that rarely receives the attention it deserves.
What are we becoming strong for?
If the ultimate expression of strength is the ability to dominate others, then strength becomes a contest for superiority.
If it is the ability to endure suffering, then suffering itself risks becoming an achievement.
If it is complete emotional invulnerability, then the ideal man becomes someone who has progressively removed himself from the experiences that make life meaningful.
He cannot be hurt because he refuses to care.
He cannot be rejected because he refuses to commit.
He cannot be disappointed because he expects nothing from anyone.
We might call this independence.
But we should at least consider whether it is also a form of retreat.
The Difficulty of Caring
Consider what it actually means to care about something.
To care is to recognise that something matters beyond your immediate comfort or convenience.
It places demands upon you.
If you care about your physical health, you must make choices that sometimes conflict with what you feel like doing.
If you care about understanding the world, you must accept the discomfort of discovering your own ignorance.
If you care about your work, you must sometimes persevere when enthusiasm has disappeared.
And if you care about another human being, the demands become considerably greater.
Love makes us vulnerable.
A parent cannot simply decide that their child's distress is irrelevant. A person who genuinely loves their partner cannot remain indifferent to their suffering. A friend who cares cannot always choose the easiest or most convenient response.
We become invested in circumstances we cannot completely control.
We expose ourselves to disappointment, grief, frustration and uncertainty.
We accept responsibilities that may be inconvenient, exhausting or frightening.
And we do so willingly.
This is not weakness.
It is one of the most demanding undertakings available to us.
It takes remarkably little effort to declare that nothing matters. It takes considerably more character to decide that something matters enough to devote yourself to it.
The Nurturer
There is an image of masculine strength that has always struck me as strangely incomplete.
The father who protects his family from danger.
We recognise him immediately. He is courageous, capable, decisive and prepared to put himself at risk for those he loves.
But what about the father who gets up before dawn to care for his child?
Who prepares breakfast, brushes her hair, helps her dress, comforts her when she's frightened, teaches her to ride a bicycle, and patiently guides her through the bewildering experience of becoming a person?
Where does he fit within our mythology of masculine strength?
He is protecting his child too.
Not necessarily from some dramatic external threat, but from the ordinary vulnerabilities of childhood.
He is building her security, confidence, understanding and capacity to navigate the world.
He is giving her something of himself.
And doing it well requires an extraordinary range of capabilities.
Patience when exhausted.
Emotional regulation when frustrated.
Judgement when uncertain.
Consistency when nobody is watching.
The ability to place another person's needs ahead of immediate gratification, without abandoning his own wellbeing.
These are not incidental qualities. They are demanding human achievements.
Yet nurturing is still too often treated as something separate from masculine strength, as though a man becomes less masculine when he performs the ordinary work of caring.
I think the opposite is true.
Nurturing is not the absence of strength.
Nurturing is strength directed towards the development and wellbeing of another person.
The same hands that lift heavy weights can gently comfort a frightened child.
The same determination that carries someone through an exhausting training session can sustain the patience required to help a child learn something difficult.
The same courage that enables a man to confront physical danger can enable him to remain emotionally present when someone he loves is suffering.
These are not contradictory expressions of masculinity.
They are different applications of human capability.
The Weakness We Mistake for Power
We should also examine what we mean when we describe someone as dominant.
A man who intimidates others may possess genuine physical power. He may be intelligent, disciplined, successful or extraordinarily capable in particular areas.
But none of those attributes automatically establishes strength of character.
If he cannot tolerate disagreement without becoming aggressive, what does that tell us about his self-command?
If he must humiliate someone to establish his authority, what does that suggest about his need for recognition?
If he cannot acknowledge a mistake without experiencing it as an intolerable threat, how intellectually secure is he?
There is a difference between possessing power and knowing how to exercise it.
And there is a difference between being feared and being respected.
The capacity to cause harm is not the same as the wisdom to refrain from causing it.
Indeed, restraint becomes meaningful precisely when someone possesses the capacity to act otherwise.
A person who cannot retaliate has no choice but to refrain. A person who can retaliate, recognises the consequences and deliberately chooses a better response demonstrates something more substantial.
This is not an argument for passivity.
There are circumstances in which confrontation is necessary, boundaries must be enforced and people must defend themselves or others.
But aggression should be an instrument governed by judgement, not an automatic response to wounded pride.
The ability to control others is not evidence that we have learned to control ourselves.
And perhaps that distinction should occupy a much more prominent place in our understanding of masculinity.
Strength Without Self-Respect Is Not Enough
There is another danger in celebrating care, compassion and responsibility.
We can inadvertently create an ideal in which a good man is expected to give endlessly while asking for very little in return.
He must be patient, understanding, dependable, emotionally available and willing to sacrifice.
And when his own needs are neglected, he is encouraged to become more patient, more understanding and more resilient.
That is not the philosophy I am proposing.
Men deserve care too.
They deserve affection, dignity, respect, emotional safety and relationships in which their contributions are recognised.
Get Stature’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
A man who cares deeply about his partner is entitled to expect that his wellbeing matters to her.
A father who devotes himself to his family does not cease to be a person with needs, ambitions and boundaries of his own.
A young man entering a relationship should be encouraged not only to become a worthy partner, but to develop the judgement to recognise whether someone else is worthy of his commitment.
Love does not require submission.
Compassion does not require tolerating cruelty.
And loyalty does not require remaining indefinitely in circumstances that diminish or harm us.
There is courage in commitment.
There can also be courage in recognising when a commitment has become destructive.
The objective is not to replace the domineering man with the endlessly self-sacrificing man.
It is to develop people capable of forming relationships between equals, in which both can flourish.
What Are You Becoming Strong For?
This brings us back to the deeper question.
Why develop ourselves at all?
Why train our bodies, cultivate our minds, confront our fears, improve our judgement or strive to become more capable?
The conventional answers are familiar.
To succeed.
To compete.
To attract a partner.
To achieve status.
To accumulate wealth.
To win.
There is nothing necessarily wrong with achievement, ambition or competition. They can be exhilarating and deeply satisfying parts of life.
But they are fragile foundations upon which to construct an entire identity.
What happens when we lose?
What happens when our bodies age, our careers change, our ambitions prove unattainable or circumstances prevent us from achieving what we once imagined?
If our worth depends upon an external outcome, failure can appear to invalidate the entire undertaking.
But perhaps we have misunderstood the value of striving.
Consider someone who dedicates years to becoming a better athlete but never wins a significant competition.
Was the effort wasted?
Consider someone who returns to education in middle age, struggles through unfamiliar material and never achieves professional recognition.
Was the intellectual development meaningless?
Consider a father who devotes himself to raising his children, knowing that his efforts will never be measured by a medal, salary or public accolade.
What exactly would constitute his success?
We are accustomed to treating effort as the price we pay for an eventual reward.
But effort can be part of the reward.
There is meaning in discovering our capabilities, in confronting worthwhile difficulty, in developing mastery and in becoming more competent participants in our own lives.
The value of the undertaking need not disappear simply because the outcome falls short of our expectations.
This does not mean that suffering is inherently good, or that every difficulty should be endured.
Some hardships are pointless. Some are destructive. Some should be prevented rather than celebrated.
The distinction lies in what makes the effort worthwhile.
We need something that matters.
Something worth our attention, commitment and perseverance.
And once we recognise that, the pursuit of strength begins to acquire a different meaning.
We do not become strong merely to demonstrate our superiority.
We become capable because there are things in life worth being capable of doing.
We develop our minds because understanding matters.
We cultivate courage because some things are worth confronting.
We practise discipline because our commitments deserve more than our passing enthusiasm.
We develop emotional strength because our behaviour affects people we care about.
And we nurture because helping another human being flourish is itself a worthwhile undertaking.
A Different Kind of Heroism
Human beings have always been drawn to stories of extraordinary courage.
The warrior facing overwhelming odds. The explorer confronting the unknown. The athlete enduring an almost impossible trial.
These stories appeal to something fundamental in our imagination.
They invite us to consider what we might become when we refuse to be governed entirely by comfort, fear or convenience.
I don't think we need to abandon that heroic imagination.
I think we need to expand it.
There is heroism in physical courage, certainly.
But there can also be heroism in the quiet persistence of someone rebuilding their life after addiction.
In the person who confronts a deeply held belief and finds the courage to change their mind.
In the parent who continues to provide warmth and security through exhaustion and uncertainty.
In the man who refuses to repeat the cruelty he experienced growing up.
In the person who chooses to remain compassionate despite having every reason to become bitter.
These undertakings may attract no audience.
There may be no victory parade, no medal and no moment of public recognition.
But that does not make them insignificant.
They require effort, commitment, courage and character.
They are part of the difficult and extraordinary work of being human.
And perhaps our understanding of masculinity would be considerably healthier if boys grew up recognising these forms of strength alongside the more dramatic ones.
Not as alternatives to ambition or physical excellence.
As expressions of the same underlying aspiration.
To become someone capable of meeting life with courage, intelligence, compassion and purpose.
The Strength to Care
I have no interest in telling boys and men that they should abandon the desire to become strong.
I want them to become strong.
Physically capable. Intellectually curious. Emotionally resilient. Courageous, disciplined and ambitious.
I want them to discover the extraordinary satisfaction of developing their capacities, of confronting difficult challenges and of experiencing the joy of becoming.
But I also want them to ask what those capacities are for.
Because strength without direction can become destructive.
Discipline without judgement can become obsession.
Independence without connection can become isolation.
And toughness without compassion can become little more than an elaborate defence against the vulnerability of being human.
There is another possibility.
A masculinity in which strength is not measured by how successfully we distance ourselves from others, but by our capacity to engage with life fully.
To care deeply.
To love without possessing.
To protect without dominating.
To strive without despising those who struggle.
To recognise our own worth without demanding the submission of others.
To develop ourselves not because we are inadequate, but because becoming capable is one of the great possibilities of being alive.
We do not need to become invulnerable.
We need to become capable of being vulnerable without abandoning our dignity.
We do not need to stop caring what happens to us.
We need to discover what matters enough to justify our efforts.
And we do not need to prove our strength by demonstrating how little we need other people.
We can demonstrate it through the quality of our relationships, the responsibilities we accept, the boundaries we maintain and the contributions we make.
Perhaps the strongest man in the room is not the one who declares that he doesn't give a fuck.
Perhaps it is the one who has the courage to care.
And the character to do something about it.
---
This essay introduces Stature, a developing philosophy of purposeful striving, human capability and responsible strength. Stature explores what it means to live deliberately, embrace worthwhile difficulty and find meaning in the lifelong undertaking of becoming.
