But Where Does the Money Go?
In 2024, Universal Music Group paid up to $200 million for a majority stake in Mavin Global, the Nigerian record label behind some of the continent’s biggest artists. It is one of the largest single investments a major label has ever made in African music.
But this acquisition did not happen in a vacuum. The year before, Mavin’s artists accumulated a combined six billion streams. Africa’s music industry has been described as the fastest-growing in the world since the post-COVID surge.
And get this, music is only one part of the story.
Africa’s gaming sector crossed $1 billion in revenue in 2024, and Sony, in partnership with the International Finance Corporation, has established a $10 million innovation fund to back African startups across film, fashion, sports, gaming, and music. If current projections hold, the entire African creative economy could be valued at $200 billion by 2030, ten percent of global creative exports.
The scale of global investment in African creative industries is significant for reasons that go beyond economics. For generations, the stories told about Africa were told by others, shaped by distance, assumptions, and a persistent tendency to reduce a continent of over a billion people to a single, flattened, and sometimes false narrative.
Streaming platforms have begun to disrupt that. When Afrobeats fills playlists in London, Lagos, and Los Angeles simultaneously and when Nollywood films are a click away from audiences in Seoul and São Paulo, the gap between how Africa is perceived and how it actually is begins to close. Some of those watching from afar are now visiting. Some of those visiting are now investing. Representation, it turns out, has real economic consequences.
But the growth story has a shadow side that rarely makes it into the same breath as the billion-dollar figures.
Towards the end of 2025, the Ghanaian government announced in its 2026 Budget Statement that approximately 40 million Ghanaian cedis would be allocated to the creative industries, with around 20 million of that earmarked specifically for film.
Ghana is not the only country moving in this direction. Morocco has had structured state support for its film sector for years, channelling consistent government funding into production in a way that has made its industry internationally competitive.
Get Yotay World’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
But the word that matters, though, is not 'funding.' It is 'structure.' Announced money and distributed money are not the same thing.
A number of African filmmakers and musicians have spoken openly about hearing that budgets have been released for their sectors, then being unable to trace where the money actually went or who received it.
This is not a problem unique to Africa; precarious creative economies exist across the United Kingdom and the United States, too. However, in many African countries, the specific vulnerability is the weakness of systems designed to ensure public funds reach the people they are intended for. Without those systems, the money does not disappear. It accumulates at the top.
The question that sits beneath every headline about billion-dollar valuations and major label acquisitions is this: What mechanisms exist to ensure that a government announcing GH¢20 million for film production translates into a rising tide and not a windfall for a small number of already connected producers? What union structures exist to protect the working creative? Has global recognition arrived faster than the structures needed to sustain it?
The creative economy should operate as a ripple: money touches one person, who employs another, who trains another, whose work eventually circulates back into a community. This only happens with the help of specific systems and structures.
Nigeria was once called the Giant of Africa ; a title that rested on the assumption that its size, oil wealth, and cultural influence would translate into sustained and shared prosperity. That translation never fully happened. The wealth existed, but the structures to distribute it equitably did not, and the gap between the story Nigeria told the world about itself and the reality of many of its citizens widened with time. Widened till hearing the title in relation to the country draws sideways glances.
Africa’s creative boom risks a version of the same story. These acquisitions, valuations, and streaming numbers will be documented. They are easy to document. But this is not the whole story.
What we are truly interested in is whether the growth is reaching the people who are generating it. Whether the musician in Sierra Leone with a genuine gift but no connections ever feels the impact of Sony’s innovation fund. Whether the filmmaker in Nairobi can make a living from their work without seeing their revenue eaten away by piracy. Piracy is a poison that cripples the backbone of the creative industry. Weak structures are another.
We are also asking whether the government budget for culture ends up as a line in a press release or as a real change in the conditions of the people working in those industries. More than just the numbers, what are we truly leaving for future generations? Is this boom fragile? How unequal is access to these funds, and how do we bridge the distance between a headline and a life actually transformed?
And this is where you will find us, Yotay World, documenting Africa’s evolving present as best we can. If we don’t track these questions now, future generations may inherit a myth of effortless success instead of a record of the struggles and decisions that shaped it.
Ruth Olatunji,
Writer || Yotay World
