Why society treats readers like outcasts
Books are dangerous. Not because they contain bad ideas. Because they make people think. And thinking people are a threat to the comfortable madness of modern life.
I see this pattern everywhere in business — employees scrolling social media get ignored, but someone reading actual book during break becomes “problem worker.” It’s fascinating psychology. Screen addiction is acceptable, but intellectual growth is suspicious. Maybe because one makes you a consumer, while the other makes you a thinker.
But why does this happen, you ask? It’s simple, hermano — seeing someone reading makes others feel guilty about their own choices, and nobody likes that mirror held up to their face.
You sit in the living room with a novel and suddenly every family member starts to worry. “Why don't you talk to us?” they say. But when you scroll through your phone for hours, everything is fine, nobody cares. WTF??
The truth is, people fear what they don’t understand, and in our culture of instant gratification, the quiet contemplation that comes with reading feels foreign and threatening. When someone sees you with a book, they’re reminded of their own intellectual laziness. They know reading is “good for you,” but they’ve chosen the easier path of mindless scrolling.
Honestly, I’ve noticed this even affects how we parent — kids get praised for “putting down their phones” but then get told they’re being antisocial when they pick up books instead.
The train commute is a trivial example. Hundreds of people with their phones. Singles with paper books. Sometimes getting unhealthy interest from others.
I don’t know if that's actually true, but airplane stewardesses say that people in business and economic classes usually engage in different activities. Economic class watches movies, plays games and scrolls through media, while business reads books. (And business class passengers do not judge each other for reading.)
Reading apps on phones prove the point perfectly — same activity, different perception. Society has trained us that swiping glowing rectangles equals normal behavior, while listing paper pages is weird. The medium matters more than the actual content.
Get Yuriy Dostoyevsky’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
And the same people who complain about readers being “antisocial” are often the ones who can’t hold a conversation that goes deeper than weather or celebrity gossip.
We’re essentially punishing people for self-improvement while rewarding those who waste time with digital distractions. It’s like we have collectively decided that personal growth is somehow selfish or antisocial behavior.
Es muy triste, but this attitude is creating a generation of people who think 25-word posts count as deep communication.
“Are you taking classes? No? Then, why are you reading it?”
The question shows a problem. Learning is only valid if the institution requires it. Personal curiosity is suspicious behavior.
The real issue isn’t that people hate reading — it’s that reading represents choice and autonomy in a world where most entertainment is designed to be passive consumption. When you read, you’re actively engaging with ideas, questioning assumptions, and building your own thoughts. When you scroll social media, you’re letting algorithms (designed by big corporations) decide what you see and think about.
Reading creates independent thinkers. Independent thinkers ask uncomfortable questions. Uncomfortable questions threaten the society's status quo that was built by the rich for centuries. Status quo benefits from passive consumers, not active minds.
The solution is really simple: I just installed a reader app on my phone, but paper books smell so good.
Anyway, let’s keep reading. The world needs more thinkers, not more scrollers.
