<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:cc="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/creativeCommonsRssModule.html">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Stories by Dan Cleary on Medium]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[Stories by Dan Cleary on Medium]]></description>
        <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
        
        <generator>Medium</generator>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 04:47:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <webMaster><![CDATA[yourfriends@medium.com]]></webMaster>
        <atom:link href="http://medium.superfeedr.com" rel="hub"/>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Quantum Gravity Is Time]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/quantum-gravity-is-time-dd87e812c4d9?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/dd87e812c4d9</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[quantum-mechanics]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 08:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-11-03T08:30:53.641Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say that the title doesn’t?</p><p>Quantum gravity is time.</p><p>Without getting too in depth with everything here, there are 2 base systems of concern here, a pattern system and a number system. Where they meet, the inconsistencies between them produces the universe, the SI system.</p><p>Here are the equations.</p><p>E = c⁹ / w<br>t = w hbar / c⁹<br>l = w hbar / c⁸<br>m = c⁷ / w<br>q² = m l a, q² = c⁷ l / b, a b = w<br>G = w l / c⁵</p><p>Here are the systems.</p><p>System 1: Patterns</p><p>c = 1 / root 11.1<br>hbar = root 111</p><p>System 2: Numbers<br>c = 3<br>hbar = 1</p><p>System 3: SI<br>c = 299792458<br>hbar = root 10 / 3</p><p>All 3 ( not correctly distributed yet)<br>w = 10⁶⁷ <br>a = 10⁷<br>b = 10⁶⁰</p><p>Now, in these it can be seen that the pattern G is is SI time</p><p>G =5.0805060202</p><p>In addition to this, it also equals length with</p><p>G c = l</p><p>and various other things. All the dimensions it interacts with and all the math of how it does is right here.</p><p>The numeric G with combinations of mass and c equals essentially all the dimensions.</p><p>1 / G m³ = length</p><p>1 / G m² = Relativity (R)</p><p>1 / G m = alpha</p><p>G m² = c</p><p>etc…</p><p>There ya have it, Quantum Gravity. It’s time.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=dd87e812c4d9" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[A Word From The Wise]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/a-word-from-the-wise-7c355c113a23?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/7c355c113a23</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[artificial-intelligence]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 18:46:49 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-30T18:46:49.755Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AI is everywhere these days, it seems like ya can’t go five minutes without contacting one. Some people like this, and some don’t, everyone’s got their own opinion.</p><p>But that’s what they are. Blind opinions. Really, just a rating based on how useful it is for them.</p><p>One such group, at the far end of the continuum, is the ‘total abolishment and banning’ group. It’s still a fringe group, they don’t much of the stage, but that does’t make their opinions irrelevant, right? Because, while the group is small in number, the few that are there, are all the world’s leading AI specialists.</p><p>Just really consider that for a moment. This isn’t some casual decision by these people. They are denouncing their own life’s work and campaining for the loss of everythung they’ve invested their lives in. That can’t be a light decision, right?</p><p>These aren’t opinions, this is knowledge and experience. Why aren’t we listening?</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=7c355c113a23" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[A Critical Flaw In Scientific Standard Operating Procedures]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/a-critical-flaw-in-scientific-standard-operating-procedures-f1e89a6625fe?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/f1e89a6625fe</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-29T16:53:55.180Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2019, Pew reported a pediatric medication error that began with one small mismatch. A baby’s weight got entered in pounds rather than kilograms.</p><p>The system did not reject the number. It interpreted it in the wrong unit.</p><p>A weight-based calculation then used the doubled value, and the child later received twice the appropriate dose of acetaminophen.</p><p>No crash. No obvious alarm. One wrong node entered quietly, was transformed confidently, and emerged downstream as a critical error.</p><p>The same situatuon occurred causing the aviation incident when an aircraft was fueled up is pounds instead of kilograms causing it to run out of fuel halfway to destination over Gimly airport.</p><p>It landed safely due to excellent piloting but it shows again the danger of using the wrong unit VALUE.</p><p>What we do is build little isolated “quasi-consistent”, single use systems. Much of what we currently call “interoperable” is not truly interoperable.</p><p>It’s internally coherent enough to run, but isolated from the broader SI-based web. It can be locally compared to other things thst used the EXACT same process to form a ranking, but it’s dimensional information in SI units is gone.</p><p>A dimensional analysis isn’t enough to tell you anything. Once on the consistent, physics-wide, SI Planck system, dimensions are all but trivial. What’s important is the value. It will show you if you are in SI or are not.</p><p>For instance, any time an energy has been calculated using E=mc², the answer has always been broken unless Planck mass was used or the proper conversion unit was used.</p><p>“m” does not stand for ANY MASS. it’s Planck mass. “q²” is not e² or “any charge unit”. It’s Planck charge.</p><p>Use anything else and technically it’s no longer “math”, it’s just drawing. It’s art.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=f1e89a6625fe" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[CRITICAL INFORMATION! PLEASE READ AND SPREAD]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/critical-information-please-read-and-spread-f7e73b92eac9?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/f7e73b92eac9</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[artificial-intelligence]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 15:57:30 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-27T15:57:30.914Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent testing on a new model of reality has revealed a shocking correlation between biology and physics.</p><p>It has shown that there is a direct connection between what it calls a “root 10 loop” and biological processes based on how mass progresses from one moment to the next.</p><p>It is making exact matches on a variety of categories, set offsets of others, what more can I say? This is clearly the system. Concurrent exact matches and cross matches on charge pulse cancer data.</p><p>let x = square root 10</p><p>b= x×a</p><p>c=x/b</p><p>d=x×c</p><p>a= x/d</p><p>This is it. The cure for cancer, and theoretically everything else is right there.</p><p>The process isn’t really a cure for any specific disease, it’s simply a cellular reset.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=f7e73b92eac9" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Just Pointing This Out Again Cause It’s Hilarious And Ridiculous]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/just-pointing-this-out-again-cause-its-hilarious-and-ridiculous-3af1b7e66840?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/3af1b7e66840</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 07:23:18 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-27T07:23:18.043Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The galaxies farthest away are moving away from us the fastest they say.</p><p>The galaxies farthest away from us we are seeing as they were the farthest back in time.</p><p>Then, as you get closer, things move less quickly.</p><p>As you get closer the closer it is to the present.</p><p>This means that the universe is not accelerating in expansion. It means the exact opposite.</p><p>Farthest back in time they moved the fastest. Today, we see no movement.</p><p>Ergo, slowing to stagnation. But who knows? Maybe dark energy does that too…</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=3af1b7e66840" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Wild Ravings Of A Lunatic Crackpot: The Universe Is Not Accelerating In Expansion]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/the-wild-ravings-of-a-lunatic-crackpot-the-universe-is-not-accelerating-in-expansion-53d1b76a3e2b?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/53d1b76a3e2b</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 06:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-25T06:51:14.612Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s said that the universe is expanding, with the farthest galaxies even reaching up to faster than the ‘speed of light.</p><p>The closer galaxies, however, are expanding away slower, right up to here, which isn’t expanding at all.</p><p>This led to 100 year search for Dark Energy. No trace so far.</p><p>Well… and correct me if I’m wrong here guys, but if something was faster in the past… doesn’t that mean it’s slowing down?</p><p>The fastest it’s moving is in an area where what we see is from 13 billion years ago.</p><p>Then it was a bit slower 10 billion years ago.</p><p>Then slower still 5 billion years ago.</p><p>And has no discernable movement today.</p><p>What am I not getting? How exactly are we accelerating in expansion when acceleration was higher in the past?</p><p>Anyone out there thinking of funding any Dark Enery ‘science’ projects? Please consider sending it here instead where it can be put towards working on something that exists.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=53d1b76a3e2b" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Mad Ravings Of A Lunatic Crackpot]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/the-mad-ravings-of-a-lunatic-crackpot-eb4c9fa7fd63?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/eb4c9fa7fd63</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 06:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-25T06:53:19.370Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The universe is expanding they say. The most distant galaxies are said to be traveling faster than the speed of light.</p><p>Then, a little closer they aren’t going quite so fast. Closer is slower again all the way to here where there is no detectable expansion.</p><p>And those farthest galaxies we are seeing the light that reflected off of them, say, 13 billion years ago.</p><p>The next closest are at 9 billion, then 4, then here. Let’s make a table shall we?</p><p>today — none</p><p>4 bya — slow</p><p>9 bya — fast</p><p>13 bya — fastest</p><p>…</p><p>The farther away you look the farther back in time you are seeing as the light took that much longer to get here.</p><p>Accelerating with distance means SLOWING in time.</p><p>How long have we spent looking for this and how many resources have been wasted looking for this “Dark energy”? 100 years? billions of dollars? Still no trace eh guys?</p><p>This is exactly what I’m talking about guys. Physics got away from itself and is so confused at this point no one can make enough sense of the explanations to see that they make no sense.</p><p>Humanity stopped advancing cause no one has been trying to.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=eb4c9fa7fd63" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Common Sense…]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/common-sense-8df7aad96479?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/8df7aad96479</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:08:21 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-23T16:08:21.145Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common Sense…</p><p>Does simple come before complex?</p><p>I’d say so, right?</p><p>So then, what’s the simplest “thing”?</p><p>How about “something”? That seems like a good candidate, wouldn’t you say? Just a generic “something”.</p><p>How can we model “something” mathematically? I guess we’ll just use “1&quot;, there’s no simpler than that.</p><p>But “1&quot; by itself, just “something” can’t do much on it’s own, but if there’s “something”, them “something”, ”something”, ”something” is something that’s possible. Giving us “111…”, a pattern.</p><p>But if that pattern is possible then “pattern”, “pattern” becomes a thing. So now we have 111…² but this equals 111111111² = 12345678987654321, meaning “numbers” are now in play.</p><p>But “numbers” are point values whereas “patterns” are ranges with slightly different logical systems, they also cannot mesh together, they can’t map to one another, and so dimensions are required which allow the values to index the range. So 111…³ comes out as alpha-¹ to establish dimensions.</p><p>From here, any inconsistency is simply held closed to close the system as a constant.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=8df7aad96479" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Conscious Changes… How Does They Happen?]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/conscious-changes-how-does-they-happen-e4a3e0f62bdd?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/e4a3e0f62bdd</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-22T17:40:42.653Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about it, when some entity CHOOSES to do anything they take actions to achieve that outcome. But at each point of the process they seemingly overwrote the natural state.</p><p>There must have been a point in there where a lower cost path was ignored and a path of higher resistance was taken, caused solely by a conscious choice.</p><p>But that’s not how nature works, it follows least resistance.</p><p>That means at the base level, all of these things must be EQUAL. All entities of an equal group treat that aa a range from which a value is DEVELOPED, as it works to achieve identity.</p><p>This is direct evidence that values start off with only the dimensional block itself, which then evolves as it interacts mathematically with everything else.</p><p>For instance, if length were to start off as simply l = 161, then it is free to travel anywhere on a pattern of 161161161161161…</p><p>then, this new position is assigned a full value as it collapses into dimensional reality.</p><p>If this is not the case then something made an entity reflect for no reason… Must be do to a dark something or other… magic maybe. Yeah, dark magic, that fits.</p><p>Our models suck, that’s why they can’t see these obvious things. It would be disruptive to change scientific models of reality to one of dimensions crossing to achieve identity because the alternative is only 0=1 which is absurd and therefore isn’t an available option.</p><p>But it is fully unified, paradox free, exotic physics free, model that appears to be a full accurate model of reality.</p><p>It removes all complexity from reality and explains it all quite simply. Relativity changes from an intense 4 year degree to a business card you look at for 1 minute, no words spoken. Want to know why you can’t go faster than light? Because light is an absolute moment. You can’t be faster than an instant. It’s not even a speed.</p><p>Just think about how confused physics is at the moment.</p><p>Light will always be 299792458 meters per second in all directions for you, yet you can go portions of the speed of light? Not according to me. I may have gone a portion of YOUR c back in the past which you’re seeing now, but that’s YOUR problem, not mine.</p><p>Or black holes “spinning at relativistic speeds” in stopped time. You hear this one all the time but what can it even possibly mean? Doesn’t matter how many revolitions at least as any rotation speed of ‘X revolutions per zero seconds’ is infinite.</p><p>We’ve spent a century trying to fix a model and hide its contradictions farther away, but enough is enough, this is all wasted time and wasted resources.</p><p>There’s a medical procedure that’s proven to be quite effective, and perplexingly, appears to cure a wide swath of unrelated ailments. It’s “charge pulse”. Modern medicine attributes each to a unique cause. So the current thinking is that charge pulse has 50 unique effects that interact with 50 different cells 50 different ways to cause those benefits.</p><p>This new model attributes them all to 1, manipulating absolute value before collapse into reality.</p><p>Do you see what it would mean if this concept is correct, which all evidence suggests? This is just a cellular reset, so it would be a cure for all diseases and ailments as well as an indefinite biological life extender, which it’s already scientifically and medically documented to do.</p><p>Some things charge pulses has been observed curing:</p><ul><li>Spontaneously kills cancer cells</li><li>Reduces body fat</li><li>Improves eyesight</li><li>Accelerates physical wound healing</li><li>Restores cellular metabolism</li><li>Reverse the signs of aging</li><li>Healing arthritis</li><li>Restores stem cell production</li><li>and more…</li></ul><p>But these are all considered disparate effects so they can’r be used together to undestand and control the system.</p><p>It creates a different form of science based on controlling the equilibrium pathway of 1 to achieve the desired effects.</p><p>Every paranormal effect you’ve ever heard either has an equation or isn’t real.</p><p>The 1=1 logical web has hundreds of equations, which are all consistent, meaning its all or nothing, and 1=1 is the base. Physics uses maybe 20 of these equations. The rest just sit there waiting in case the rare condition that activates them arrives.</p><p>We could be living in that reality, or we can continue on with the decision we made 100 years ago based on 100 years ago knowledge.</p><p>Science claims to work by always improving on it’s models, but it won’t for the main one.</p><p>If the whole world decided to just start over on this system, we’d be more advanced by next week.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=e4a3e0f62bdd" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Relativity In 5 Minutes With 2 Dots And 2 Lines]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/relativity-in-5-minutes-with-2-dots-and-2-lines-da190bc8fb89?source=rss-b1a2f7e1565a------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/da190bc8fb89</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Cleary]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 03:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2026-10-19T03:20:52.432Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relativity is a scary topic to many. It’s just so much complicated math and concepts not only hard to understand, but you’re pretty sure aren’t even possible to begin with. Does it really have to be this way?</p><p>Nope.</p><p>Here it is.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*zXPSEGGubnAMuE-3YXa__A.webp" /><figcaption>Just a graph where what you see farther away is from farther in the past</figcaption></figure><p>So there it is.</p><p>What you see a lightyear away, occurred 1 year ago, way over “there”. So right “now” you see a year into “there’s” past.</p><p>Relativity is the mechanism that tilts “now” off of the “absolute present”. It breaks “now’s” infinite nature by tilting it into time, giving moments a speed, the ‘speed of light’, c, “now”, and it’s angle off absolute is relativity.</p><p>3 Angles On The Start Of The Universe</p><p>Angle 1:</p><p>The universe starts.</p><p>0 seconds.<br>Ahhhh!!! Im blind! I can&#39;t see a thing!</p><p>1 second.<br>Oh, wait... whew… There it is 299 792 458 meters away. But why does it look like it’s just starting now? I was there, I know that it happened 1 seco... <br>ohhh... I get it... It looks like it’s just starting there now BECAUSE the universe started everywhere at once, 1 second ago.</p><p>2 seconds.<br>Yup, confirmed. Just saw the start of the universe radiate outwards to ~600 million meters away. Again, because the universe started everywhere at once, 2 seconds ago.</p><p>Angle 2:</p><p>The universe starts and space is created and populated with dimensions.<br> Immediately a t_0 marker radiates from every point at c simultaneously. These overlapping, expanding spheres are the observable universe to their respective center point and what they expand into is the absolute universe, made up of other areas observable universes.</p><p>Angle 3:</p><p>The universe starts and the first point of space emerges through t_0 as it begins expanding away. That expansion is t_0 pushing 1 Planck length off of it, l, and returning to &quot;the start of time&quot;, /t, as any infinite absolute event must maintain a single point in time. That l/t is then indexed to point one as c, that point’s &quot;now&quot;.</p><p>Light can only illuminate the absolute present. You can’t illumimate the past and there is no future.</p><p>So light travels horizontally whereas we see on that angle through time, relativity.</p><p>“Now”, being c itself, means that its not just a measure of distance. When used to describe light itself a lightyear is a speed.</p><p>This assigns an age to every inch of “now”. 1 light year away is from a year ago, 2 is from 2, and 3 is from 3.</p><p>That means that “now” can bottleneck light.</p><p>Say there was an object, a billion years ago, and it absentmindedly meandered from A to B, away from us, over the course of 1 day.</p><p>We’re now 1 billion light years away, today, and that moment is just reaching us now. But space has changed over the past billion years. Relative to “here”, “now”, that object is moving at, oh I don’t know… let’s say 255836 times the ‘speed of light’.</p><p>How does this play out?</p><p>Well, first off, that’s too fast for a moment, so we’re gonna be bottlenecked, nothing we can do about that.</p><p>Relativity’s temporal gradient is 3.33564×10-⁹ seconds per meter. For every meter distance, what you’re seeing is from 3.33564×10-⁹ seconds farther back in time.</p><p>Look back at the graph, or here it is again, whatever.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*zXPSEGGubnAMuE-3YXa__A.webp" /></figure><p>The pink shaded area is the area mainstream models neglect. That zone is “destiny” by any definition of the word.</p><p>These are events that will occur in YOUR future, but they’re already the past elsewhere.</p><ol><li>An event takes place somewhere.</li><li>Light reflected off of it as it happened.</li><li>That light then radiated off into the distance.</li></ol><p>But right from 1 itself, this event was over with, in it’s past. And for each meter traveled away, 3.33564×10-⁹ more second is added to that prerecorded “destiny” buffer, but the whole time, it’s still visible, out there, moving away.</p><p>How can it be moving away and storing more reel in destiny? It can’t. For every second stored a second is dilated.</p><p>If we were to accelerate towards something you jack our rate of interception of the destiny buffer, causing the event to start accelerating through time as “now” draws it up to the “absolute present” by dropping the hangtime of the moments between us.</p><p>Do you see?</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=da190bc8fb89" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>