Don’t Fight About the Rate. Ask About the Hours.
Two sets of numbers landed on October 8. Both of them have something to say about your next renewal.
On October 8, two organizations with nothing to do with each other published numbers that say the same thing.
TCS reported its quarter ended September 30. Revenue of $7,642 million. Growth, in their own words, “+0.2% QoQ, +2.4% YoY in USD.” And a line further down: “Annualized AI Revenue at US$ 3.1 billion in Q2FY27, crosses 10% of Revenue.”
Read those two together. AI work is now more than a tenth of the book. The book itself barely moved.
Same day, ISG published its quarterly contract index. Combined annual contract value of $52.5 billion, up 63 percent, the biggest quarterly jump they’ve recorded. Cloud and as-a-service came in at $41.2 billion, up 95 percent, with infrastructure alone up 115 percent. Traditional managed services, the hours business, came in at $11.3 billion. Up 2.1 percent. ISG raised its full-year cloud forecast to 60 percent growth and left managed services exactly where it was, at 2.1. Their chief AI officer’s line was “The AI infrastructure boom is still accelerating.”
One caution before anybody quotes me on it. ISG counts commercial contracts of $5 million and up, so read it as a picture of big deals, not the whole market.
Still. The money is going to the people who sell machines. The people who sell hours got 2.1 percent.
What the arithmetic actually says
I want to be careful here, because this next part is my read and not anybody’s claim.
TCS doesn’t say AI revenue is eating its other revenue. Flat growth has a dozen causes, currency among them, and any firm that size can have a rough quarter in one industry for reasons that have nothing to do with AI.
But arithmetic is arithmetic. If one slice of the book grows past 10 percent and the pie doesn’t grow, another slice got smaller. Something in there shrank by roughly what AI gained.
And I’d bet a good share of it is hours. Not jobs, necessarily. Hours. The hours it used to take to write the test cases, migrate the code, document the thing, staff the tower overnight. Those are the hours on your statement of work.
Here’s the part that should change how you walk into your renewal. Your integrator’s own reporting shows this shift before your invoice does. They are living it at the top of their house a year or two before you feel it at the bottom of yours.
The wrong fight
So renewal season comes, and somebody from your side walks into the room and fights about the rate.
Wrong fight. The rate is the one number your vendor is delighted to argue about all afternoon. It’s a point or two, it’s symmetrical, both sides get to feel like they worked for a living, and it isn’t where the money moved.
The hours moved. If the work takes a third of the people it used to and the invoice didn’t change, somebody kept the difference, and it wasn’t you.
That’s not an accusation of bad faith. It’s a contract that prices inputs, signed in a different year, in a year when the inputs changed. Nobody has to cheat for a lot of money to move.
The meeting you already have
You don’t need a new forum for this. You have a renewal, or a quarterly business review, already on the calendar with an hour blocked and senior people in the room. Keep the hour. Change three questions.
How many of your people were on my account twelve months ago, and how many are on it today?
What did one finished thing cost me last year, and what does it cost now? Use a unit you both already count. A closed ticket. A migrated application. A release. A processed claim.
Get Cory Smith’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Where did AI show up in delivering my work this year, and what did it change about what you spend to serve me?
Then stop talking and let the room sit there. That’s the whole technique. The silence after the second question will tell you more than the answer to the first one.
The honest counterargument
The strongest case against me is a good one, and I’ve been on the receiving end of it.
Push a services firm onto output pricing and you get exactly what you asked for. They’ll staff your account with their cheapest available people, wrap a generic accelerator around your problem, and optimize whatever unit you named while the thing you actually wanted gets worse. Pricing knowledge work by the delivered unit is genuinely hard to define, and a buyer who demands it badly ends up worse off than one who never asked.
That’s fair. So don’t go redesign the contract this week.
Ask the three questions and write the answers down. A vendor who answers all three straight has earned the renewal, and probably deserves a rate conversation in their favor. A vendor who dodges all three just told you what they think their own productivity story is worth. You learn the most useful thing available to you either way, and it costs you nothing but an hour you’d already blocked.
One name
Whoever owns that contract has to be the one who asks. Not procurement as a department. Not sourcing as a function. The person whose name goes on the signature line, in the room, asking about headcount out loud, where the account executive has to answer in front of their own delivery lead.
That’s the whole thing. Keep the pen.
The bigger point
Rate cards are how we buy people’s time. A lot of that time is going away, and it’s going away faster at the top of your vendor’s income statement than at the bottom of your invoice.
So when they come in next quarter with the deck about how much they’ve invested in AI, take them at their word. Then ask what it did to the hours.
If the answer is nothing, why did they bring it up?
About the Author
Cory Smith has spent 28 years doing the unglamorous work behind technology waves, across 60+ Fortune 500 organizations in insurance, banking, automotive, retail, energy, aerospace, and beyond. He’s the founder of Signal & Horizon, an enterprise AI strategy consultancy, and he writes from operator experience rather than analyst credentials, having sat in the rooms where the money got committed and in the post-mortems afterward. His work sits where strategy meets execution, helping organizations move from AI curiosity to AI capability.
He’s the author of four books, including three Amazon bestsellers: Beautifully Human: Designing AI with Soul and Purpose, Wired for Change, and Lean Innovation. His newest, Shoot, Ready, Aim: How the AI Industry Sold Everyone a Revolution Nobody Was Ready For, is out now on Amazon. Check it out here.
He’s currently available for:
- Speaking engagements. Live events, television, and podcasts. Learn more here.
- Consulting engagements. Limited time and scope advisory work for organizations navigating AI strategy, governance, and transformation. Learn more here.
- Senior leadership roles. Open to full-time opportunities in AI strategy, emerging technology, innovation, or culture change and adoption.
If any of that resonates, reach out. A DM or an email works great.
