Reddit Lead Finder: Find Buying Intent Leads
Pricing
from $20.00 / 1,000 qualified leads
Reddit Lead Finder: Find Buying Intent Leads
Find Reddit posts with buying intent: people asking for a tool like yours, unhappy with a competitor, or ready to switch. Delivered scored, ranked, and with a suggested reply on each. No API key, no login.
Pricing
from $20.00 / 1,000 qualified leads
Rating
0.0
(0)
Developer
mick_
Maintained by CommunityActor stats
0
Bookmarked
2
Total users
1
Monthly active users
6 days ago
Last modified
Categories
Share
Reddit Lead Finder: Find Buying Intent & Competitor Complaints
Turn Reddit into a lead list. Reddit Lead Finder scans public Reddit for people asking for a tool like yours, complaining about a competitor, or looking to switch, then hands you the few posts that matter, scored, ranked, and with a suggested reply on each. No API keys, no login, no manual thread-reading.
Built for founders and marketers who want customers, not a 1,000-row data dump.
Why this over a raw Reddit scraper?
A raw scraper returns 1,000 posts and leaves you to read them. This finds the 12 that are actually leads.
| Raw Reddit scraper | 🎯 Reddit Lead Finder | |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Every post that matched | Only scored buying-intent leads |
| Reading required | You read 1,000 rows | You read the ranked shortlist |
| Per lead | Intent? Unknown | Intent type + score + why |
| Off-topic keyword matches | Yours to spot | Dropped by a semantic gate (no API key) |
| Founders promoting their own product | Looks like a lead | Scored down as self-promo, not a buyer |
| Next step | Figure it out | Suggested reply on every lead |
| You pay for | Every row | Only qualified leads |
Buyers, not sellers
The trap in Reddit lead-gen is that "I built a time tracker, check it out" matches the same keywords as "anyone recommend a time tracker?" — one is a competitor, the other is a customer. Keyword tools can't tell them apart, so they hand you founders as leads.
This actor scores self-promotion down explicitly: "I made", "I built", "[OS]", "my app", "looking for beta testers", "side project", plus roundup and content-marketing titles ("Best X 2026", "The 3 Tools That Helped Me", "I tested 5 apps", "<Product> review"). The penalty is sized so a launch post or listicle can't reach a normal threshold even when it carries the same keyword, question, and first-person signals a real buyer does — which is exactly how these slip past keyword-only tools.
It stays a score penalty rather than a silent drop, so the reason shows up in scoreReasons and you can lower minIntentScore to audit what was held back.
👥 Who uses this
🚀 Bootstrapped SaaS founders
You want customers from Reddit without spamming. Point it at your category and competitors, get back threads where someone is actively asking for what you sell.
{"productDescription": "A lightweight time-tracking app for freelancers.","keywords": ["time tracking app", "track freelance hours", "toggl alternative"],"competitors": ["Toggl", "Harvest", "Clockify"],"intentTypes": ["seeking_recommendation", "competitor_complaint", "switching_intent"],"timeFilter": "month","maxLeads": 50}
📣 Growth marketers & agencies
Run social-selling and competitor-conquesting campaigns. Filter to competitor_complaint + switching_intent to catch people mid-churn from a rival.
{"productDescription": "A CRM built for small real-estate teams.","keywords": ["real estate CRM", "CRM for realtors"],"competitors": ["Follow Up Boss", "kvCORE"],"intentTypes": ["competitor_complaint", "switching_intent"],"minIntentScore": 65}
🔎 Market researchers
Surface unmet needs and feature requests in your space with feature_request + problem_unaware, scored so you can rank pain by frequency.
🧠 How it works
- Scans Reddit for your keywords and competitor names (public data, residential proxies, no login).
- Scores every post through a three-tier pipeline (details below).
- Delivers only qualified leads, each with an intent type, a 0 to 100 score, the reasons it scored, and a suggested reply.
Three-tier scoring (precision without a key)
| Tier | What it does | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Lexicon | Fast keyword and intent-cue match. Kills obvious noise. | Free, on by default |
| 2. Semantic gate | Local embeddings check that a post is actually about your product, not just sharing a word. Drops "time tracking" in r/Porsche (track days) even though the phrase matches. | Free, on by default, no key |
| 3. LLM (optional) | Set scoringMode: llm with your own API key for the sharpest read on ambiguous posts. Falls back to lexicon on any error. | Your key, only runs on posts that pass tiers 1 and 2 |
Tiers 1 and 2 need no API key and run on every post, so you get semantic precision out of the box. The LLM tier is an optional top layer, and because it only sees posts that already passed the cheaper tiers, it stays cheap.
📤 Sample output
Each dataset item is one qualified lead. This is a real lead from a live run, not a mockup:
{"leadId": "t3_1v8scw0","type": "post","intentType": "seeking_recommendation","intentScore": 67,"scoreReasons": ["matched intent cue: 'looking for'","mentions your keyword(s): time tracking app","phrased as a question"],"matchedKeywords": ["time tracking app"],"title": "FREE PLAN vs. FREE TRIAL in time tracking software: What's their difference? Here are some pros and cons.","snippet": "\"Free\" is hard to resist, especially when you're looking for time tracking software for a growing team. But here's the catch: how many of the tools that show up when you search \"free time tracking app\" are actually free to keep using?...","url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/TimeTrackingSoftware/comments/1v8scw0/","subreddit": "TimeTrackingSoftware","author": "nazoraya","score": 3,"numComments": 3,"createdAt": "2026-07-28T08:39:36+00:00","ageHours": 39.5,"suggestedAction": "Reply recommending your product. They are actively asking, so a direct, helpful answer fits.","sentiment": "negative","isAnswered": false}
No free text to parse. Every field is typed and structured on arrival — an AI agent (or a human) can act on suggestedAction the moment the lead lands, with no summarization step in between.
🏷️ Intent types
| Intent | Catches | Example |
|---|---|---|
seeking_recommendation | People directly asking for a tool | "Any recommendations for a time tracker?" |
competitor_complaint | People unhappy with a rival | "Toggl is too expensive now" |
switching_intent | People actively leaving a tool | "Moving off Harvest, need a replacement" |
feature_request | People describing a missing capability | "Wish there was a tool that could..." |
problem_unaware | People with the problem, no solution named | "Spending hours reconciling invoices by hand" |
💸 Pricing (plain and honest)
Two line items. That is the whole bill.
- $0.06 per search run: charged once, only when the run delivers at least one qualified lead.
- $0.02 per qualified lead: charged only for leads delivered to your dataset.
You are never charged when we deliver nothing. Blocked run, zero matches, or zero leads above your threshold = $0.00. Set ACTOR_MAX_TOTAL_CHARGE_USD to hard-cap any run. Full detail: docs/PRICING.md.
Example: 12 leads = $0.06 + 12 × $0.02 = $0.30.
📥 Bulk input
Driving from a spreadsheet or a prior run? Skip the keyword box:
keywordsDatasetId: an Apify dataset of keyword strings or{ "keyword": "..." }objects.keywordsFileUrl: a public.csv(columnkeyword) or newline-delimited.txt.
All sources merge with the inline list and de-duplicate automatically.
⚙️ Input reference
| Field | Type | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
productDescription | string | - | Required. What you sell. Powers intent matching. |
keywords | array | - | Category terms + competitor names. Optional if using bulk input. |
competitors | array | [] | Names that boost complaint/switching scores. |
subreddits | array | [] | Empty = all of Reddit. One value restricts search. |
intentTypes | array | 3 core types | Which signals to surface. |
minIntentScore | int | 55 | Below this: not returned, not charged. |
timeFilter | enum | month | day / week / month / year / all. |
maxLeads | int | 50 | Cap on delivered leads (1-500). |
scoringMode | enum | lexicon | lexicon (free: tiers 1+2) or llm (adds tier 3, your key). |
openaiApiKey | secret | - | Only for scoringMode: llm. Never stored. |
keywordsDatasetId / keywordsFileUrl | string | - | Bulk keyword sources. |
proxyConfiguration | object | Residential | Reddit blocks datacenter IPs. |
🤖 Using this from an AI agent
Like every actor on Apify, this one is callable over MCP (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, via the Apify MCP server) and payable via x402 — an agent can run and pay for it in USDC on Base with no Apify account and no API key. Those are platform capabilities, so a raw Reddit scraper has them too.
The part that matters for an agent is what comes back. Point an agent at a raw scraper and it gets 1,000 posts it still has to read, classify, and summarize — every one of those tokens is yours. Point it here and each item is already a decision:
for lead in dataset: # already filtered to qualified leadsif lead["intentScore"] >= 75 and lead["intentType"] == "switching_intent":draft_reply(lead["url"], brief=lead["suggestedAction"])
intentType is a typed enum, intentScore is 0-100, scoreReasons explains the call, and suggestedAction is the reply brief. No summarization step, no LLM pass to figure out which rows matter, no prompt engineering to classify intent — that work already happened server-side, in the price of the lead.
🔌 Integrations
Output is a standard Apify dataset: export to JSON, CSV, Excel, pipe into n8n, Zapier, Make, or wire into your own stack via the Apify API. Schedule daily runs to catch leads while they are still fresh.
❓ FAQ
Do I need a Reddit account or API key? No. Public data only.
Why residential proxies? Reddit hard-blocks datacenter IPs. Residential is required for reliable results and is included in the price above.
Is this against Reddit's terms? It reads only public pages, takes no in-Reddit actions (no posting, voting, or DMing), and paces requests politely. Use the leads to engage authentically, not to spam.
How accurate are the leads? Default scoring runs two tiers with no key: a lexicon filter plus a local semantic gate that checks a post is genuinely about your product, not just sharing a keyword. This catches most false positives (like "time tracking" in a car forum). For the sharpest read on ambiguous posts, set scoringMode: llm with your own key to add a third LLM tier, which only runs on posts that already passed the first two.
Can an AI agent run and pay for this by itself? Yes. It supports x402, so an agent can pay per run in USDC on Base with no Apify account or API key. It is also exposed as an MCP tool for Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor.
What if a run finds nothing? You pay nothing. No leads, no charge.
Made by mick_. Companion to Reddit Scraper, use that for raw data at scale, this for ready-to-act leads.