本文通过OriginKrigingTest、BlindKrigingTest、RegressionKrigingTest和StochasticKrigingTest四种Kriging插值方法进行对比，详细展示了不同方法的模型参数、预测结果和交叉验证误差。实验结果显示各方法在预测均值和方差方面存在显著差异，对数据的拟合和预测能力各有优劣。
2015年12月08日星期二
T.s.road总结笔记：KrigingLab2204
作者说明：克里金插值程序
When running thisprogramme, the author’s PC setting is:
Microsoft Windows 7 (SP1) + Matlab R2011b +CPU 3.6GHz + RAM 8.0GB.
(Data form Lab 2204; Check by Keung Charteris & T.s.road CZQ)
1.OriginKrigingTest.m
模型参数：
Building model...done
Evaluating model at (2.54.5).
Prediction mean = 45.520671.Prediction variance = 5.092937.
Derivatives of: predictionmean = (0.842217 0.907005). prediction variance = (-1.41371e-015-1.66364e-016).
Leave-one-outcrossvalidation: 4.863764 (using the mean squared error function).
Integrated Mean Square Error:129.112898.
Marginal likelihood (-log):-17.055291.
Pseudo likelihood (-log):59.781924.
Process variance: 11.699252
Sigma(1,1): 0.000000 (firstelement of intrinsic covariance matrix).
Formatted regressionfunction: 0
Calculating derivatives forcontour plot... (may take a while).
模型效果：
扫一扫
427
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
