Sitemap

I Spent Months Testing Open Source Headless CMS Platforms — These 10 Stood Out

5 min readJun 3, 2026

--

I remember the exact moment I realized my relationship with traditional WordPress was over. It wasn’t a single “White Screen of Death,” but rather the realization that I was spending 70% of my week updating plugins and fighting with CSS overrides instead of actually building features.

My team’s performance metrics were tanking, and our frontend developers were practically begging for the freedom to use Next.js without jumping through hoops. We needed to decouple. We needed a headless architecture that didn’t lock us into a proprietary monthly subscription that scaled poorly with our traffic.

Get Jayasurya Mailsamy’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

I spent the next six months testing every major open-source headless CMS on the market. I broke things, migrated databases three times, and eventually found a handful of tools that actually delivered on their promises. Here is the breakdown of the ten solutions that survived my “stress tests” and why they might be the right fit for your next project.

The Heavy Hitter: Strapi

If you’ve spent any time in the headless space, you’ve heard of Strapi. It was the first one I tried, and for a good reason. It’s built on Node.js and gives you a fully customizable admin panel right out of the box.

Why it stuck with me

The community support is massive. When I ran into a weird permissions issue with a custom role, a quick search on their forum solved it in minutes. It’s highly extensible, meaning I could write custom controllers when the default API didn’t quite do what I wanted.

The trade-off

It can feel a bit heavy. If you’re running on a tiny VPS, the memory usage might surprise you during build times. But for a mid-to-large enterprise project, it’s hard to beat the Strapi ecosystem.

The Developer’s Dream: Payload CMS

If I’m being honest, Payload is where I eventually moved my personal blog. It is a “code-first” CMS. Instead of clicking around a UI to build your data structures, you define them in TypeScript.

The “Aha” moment

Everything is just a JavaScript object. There are no “black boxes.” If I want to change how a field validates, I write a function. It uses Express and MongoDB (or Postgres), so if you know the MERN stack, you already know Payload.

Performance wins

Because it’s so lean, my API response times dropped significantly compared to my old monolithic setup. It feels like a tool built by developers, for developers.

The Database Whisperer: Directus

Directus is unique because it doesn’t try to own your data. It’s essentially a layer that sits on top of your existing SQL database.

My experience with legacy data

I had a project with a massive, messy Postgres database that I didn’t want to migrate. I pointed Directus at it, and within ten minutes, I had a beautiful REST and GraphQL API. It didn’t force a new schema on me; it just mirrored what I already had.

Flexibility

It’s great for teams who have data scientists or analysts who need to look at the “raw” data while the marketing team uses the GUI to manage content.

Content First: Ghost

Wait, isn’t Ghost for blogging? Yes, but its headless mode is a hidden gem. I used it for a high-traffic news site experiment, and the editorial experience is miles ahead of the competition.

The editor experience

My writers hated Strapi. They found it too “technical.” When I moved them to the Ghost editor, the complaining stopped. It’s clean, focused, and supports Markdown and Koenig blocks effortlessly.

The headless twist

You can disable the frontend entirely and just use the Content API. If you’re building a content-heavy site where the “authoring experience” is the priority, don’t sleep on Ghost.

The Git-Based Alternative: TinaCMS

TinaCMS is different. It’s a “visual” headless CMS that lives in your Git repository.

Real-time editing

I tried this on a landing page project. Being able to see the changes live on the site as I typed — while knowing those changes were being committed as JSON files to GitHub — was a game changer for version control.

The limitation

It’s perfect for static sites (SSG), but I wouldn’t use it for a dynamic application with millions of user-generated records.

The GraphQL Powerhouse: KeystoneJS

Keystone has been around for a long time, but the recent versions are incredibly sleek. It’s built on top of Prisma and Nexus.

Why I liked it

The automated GraphQL schema generation is best-in-class. If your frontend team is all-in on Apollo or Urql, Keystone provides a type-safe experience that makes development feel like magic. It’s opinionated in the right ways.

The Minimalist: Cockpit

Sometimes you don’t need a massive framework. You just need a place to store some JSON and an API to fetch it. Cockpit is a “COntent toolkit” that is refreshingly simple.

Small but mighty

I used Cockpit for a small IoT project where I needed to manage configuration settings remotely. It’s written in PHP, which makes hosting it on cheap shared servers incredibly easy. It’s fast, light, and stays out of your way.

The Netlify Evolution: Decap CMS

You might remember this as Netlify CMS. It’s now an open-source project called Decap. Like Tina, it’s Git-based.

Zero-cost hosting

Since there is no “server” (it’s just a React app that interacts with your Git provider), you can host the CMS for free on platforms like Netlify or Vercel. For small client sites on a budget, this is my go-to recommendation.

Scaling for Enterprise: Squidex

Squidex is built on .NET and is designed for serious complexity. It handles versioning, localization, and complex workflows better than almost any other open-source tool I tested.

Workflow management

If you need a “Draft -> Legal Review -> Final Approval -> Published” pipeline, Squidex makes it easy to visualize. It’s robust, but the learning curve is steeper than something like Payload.

The Serverless Specialist: Webiny

Webiny is built specifically for the serverless era. It’s designed to be deployed on AWS using Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3.

Cost efficiency at scale

If you have massive spikes in traffic, Webiny scales automatically. I found the deployment process a bit complex (you need to be comfortable with the Serverless Framework and AWS), but once it’s up, the maintenance is virtually zero.

How to Choose Without Going Crazy

After months of hopping between these tools, I realized that “the best” CMS doesn’t exist. There is only the best CMS for your specific stack and team.

If you are a JavaScript/TypeScript purist, go with Payload. If you have a legacy database, use Directus. If you are building a high-end publication, stick with Ghost. And if you want the safest, most documented bet, Strapi is the way to go.

Moving to a headless architecture was the best technical decision I made last year. It didn’t just make our site faster; it made my developers happier. We stopped fighting the CMS and started using it as a tool to build better products.

--

--

Jayasurya Mailsamy
Jayasurya Mailsamy

Written by Jayasurya Mailsamy

Senior Full-Stack Developer | Tech Enthusiast | Indian | Tamil