The Line and the Paper
Imagine the whole of life drawn as a single number line.
At the centre is zero. To the left are the things we have agreed to call bad: fear, anger, greed, addiction, hatred, and at the far end, evil. To the right are the things we call good: comfort, success, career, morality. We spend most of our lives trying to move rightward along this line and away from the left.
Nature didn’t draw these markings. We did. Societies, families and cultures decide what counts as positive and negative, and the line’s rules change from one place and century to the next. The line is real enough to live by, but its numbers are human conventions.
The holy is still on the line
The part of the diagram I care about most is the gold section on the far right: seeking, spiritual practice, samādhi.
When we start a spiritual path, it feels like stepping off the line entirely. It isn’t. Meditation, devotion, reading the scriptures, the feeling of being spiritual, even deep states of stillness, are all just very high positive numbers. They sit on the same line as success and morality, a few marks further along. The ego hasn’t left the game. It has found a more respectable place to keep score.
Get Nagleadvait’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
This is why practice can become a trap. Practices are useful. They loosen our grip on the lower numbers and point us somewhere. But a seeker who clings to practice is still a point trying to become a bigger point.
Not above the line: the paper
My first instinct was to say that realization means rising above the line. That isn’t quite right either, because “above” is still a location. It quietly becomes the biggest number of all, a higher place to stand.
So look at the diagram differently. Don’t look at the line. Look at what it is drawn on.
The paper isn’t positive or negative. It isn’t at zero, and it isn’t in some separate place above or apart from the line. Every mark on the line, from evil to samādhi, is made of paper equally. The worst vice and the highest spiritual state contain exactly the same amount of paper. The blank space around the line isn’t empty either. The line depends on the paper; the paper doesn’t depend on the line.
Realization isn’t moving to a better point, and it isn’t erasing the line. Career, morality, anger and practice all keep appearing. They’re just no longer where you live. You stop identifying with a position and recognise yourself as what every position is drawn on.
Brahma satyam, jagan mithyā
Ādi Śaṅkara put this in one verse: Brahma satyam, jagan mithyā, jīvo brahmaiva nāparaḥ. Brahman is real, the world is appearance, and the individual self is nothing other than Brahman.
Mithyā doesn’t mean the world is nonexistent. It means it isn’t self-standing. It appears, but only ever as an appearance of something else, like a line that only exists as ink on paper. The last phrase, jīvo brahmaiva nāparaḥ, keeps this from becoming a rejection of the world. You aren’t a point that must escape the line. You were always the paper.
Of course, this is also only an analogy. It’s one more set of marks on the page. Use it the way you’d use a raft, and leave it at the shore.
