Building an AI Agent Is Easy but..
Running It in Production Is the Real Challenge
Building an AI agent sounds easy enough these days. You grab a language model, bolt on some tools, toss together a few Python scripts, and suddenly you’ve got an agent that reads documents, answers questions, handles requests, maybe even talks to your business apps.
Getting a demo up and running isn’t so hard. But making that same agent work — really work — when all sorts of people and teams are counting on it? That’s where the pain starts.
In a demo, the world is simple. You know the inputs, everything behaves as expected, and the workflow moves in a tidy, predictable line. Real business is messier. Users pile on at the same time. Systems outside your control fail. Approvals drag out. Maybe the agent gets interrupted halfway and loses its place entirely.
That leads to the real question: What do you do when your agent nails every test, but blows up when someone needs it for actual business?
Turns out, the trouble usually isn’t the AI model itself — it’s everything around it. The software, the processes, the guardrails. That’s where things either work or fall apart.
Moving past prototype
Early prototypes get away with a lot. They stash data in memory and run all in one Python process. Good enough for a proof of concept, nothing you’d trust for a real team.
Imagine this: Someone tries to file a reimbursement claim. The agent checks policies, validates receipts, creates a draft. Then, the app restarts before finishing up. If everything’s stored in memory, the agent forgets where it left off. Next time the person tries, maybe it repeats itself, or generates duplicate requests. It’s a mess.
That’s why you need persistent workflow state. Every important task should have a unique ID, some sense of status, and enough detail to recover if something goes sideways. The system has to know if it’s still waiting for info, waiting for approval, done, or lost. Don’t lean on the language model to remember anything — it won’t.
And, while you’re at it, keep your environments clean. Test safely, with fake data and creds. Keep production locked down. Blurring those lines invites disaster.
Dealing with retries
Here’s a classic headache: your agent calls an external system, and the network flakes out. Let’s say it tries to post an invoice to the ERP. The ERP does its job, but the agent never gets the confirmation, so it tries again. Suddenly, you’ve got two invoices.
This isn’t the model making a dumb choice. It’s because the app can’t tell if the action failed, or if the response just got lost.
How do you fix it? Idempotency. Every real-world business action gets a stable, unique identifier, so if the same request runs twice, nothing happens the second time. Check with the source of truth before retrying any uncertain “write.” This rule isn’t just nerdy software stuff — it’s how you protect payments, refunds, permissions, and everything else that actually matters.
A timeout doesn’t always mean the business action failed.
What does this all cost?
People love to obsess about token counts or how much a single model call costs. But those stats miss the bigger picture.
Real business workflows hit the model a bunch of times, fetch documents, poke databases, send things for approval. If the agent keeps asking for the same data, or pings the model when a basic Python function would work, costs go up, responses slow down, and everyone gets irritated.
Get s v’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
It’s smarter to track the real cost of getting one verified business job done, not just what it took to generate an answer.
Of course adding checks and approvals introduces some delays. But those guardrails exist for a reason — without them, your “automation” can spiral out of control. Cut out redundant work, but do not cut the stuff that protects your business.
Watching what actually happens inside
When things go wrong, all you see is some sad error message — usually not enough to tell what screwed up.
Say someone says their reimbursement got lost. Did the app misinterpret their request? Did it fetch an old policy? Did it call the wrong API? Did something timeout? Or did it just fumble a final check?
Without good monitoring, all those failures start to look the same.
So, you need logs, traces, and metrics. Logs give you the play-by-play. Traces let you see the whole journey. Metrics help you spot patterns like rising errors, slowdowns, or strange retry storms.
Just as important, track business outcomes. An agent that replies fast but never actually gets work done is useless. One that says “success” but never actually changes the underlying record is a disaster. What really matters is whether the agent finished the business task, got it verified, and ended up in the right state.
Being ready for things to break
Let’s be honest: Something unexpected will go wrong. Models change. APIs break. Data shifts. Some clever new rule blocks stuff you never thought it would. You can not eliminate every failure, but you can at least be ready for when they happen.
That’s where rollback plans and runbooks save the day.
A runbook is your checklist: where to look, who fixes what, when to freeze changes, and how to reset things to safety. Rollbacks mean you can quickly switch back to a known good version — whether that’s a prompt, model, tool, or entire workflow.
Kill Switch
A kill switch is also a lifesaver. Picture this: Your refund agent starts acting up. Instead of killing the entire app, just pause refunds and keep everything else running. That keeps customer service afloat while you root out the problem.
One more thing — turn every big incident into a regression test. Don’t let the same fire start twice.
Bottom line
Building an AI agent means showing off what the tech can do. Running it in production is about making sure it doesn’t embarrass you when, not if, things get tough.
Reliable agents stick around because they manage state, retry safely, enforce clear boundaries, monitor every move, watch costs, recover fast, and give you a way to undo mistakes. The biggest mistake? Thinking a smart language model guarantees a reliable app. It doesn’t.
A model can deeply “understand” a request, but unless the surrounding system can handle real-world messiness — transactions, permissions, errors, and validation — you’re asking for trouble.
A successful AI agent isn’t just the one that sounds convincing. It’s the one that actually finishes the job, shows proof, and can bounce back when things break.
That’s the gap between a clever demo and a real business tool you’d trust.
