Three Chicks, One Lie, and a Very Stubborn AI
-How often do we exhaust ourselves trying to make something make sense when the real problem is that one of our starting assumptions is false?
Me-hmm…could you answer a question?
chat gpt-Of course, Suman. 😊
Tell me what’s on your mind. I’ll listen carefully, think it through, and give you an honest answer — even if I think you’re looking at it the wrong way.
Me-3 chiks are walking in a line…the first chick said there are 2 chicks behind me, the last chick said 2 chicks are ahead of me, and the middle one said I have 2 chicks behind me and two chicks ahead of me…..how is this possible?
chat gpt-😂 Suman, the trick is in the middle chick’s statement!
If there are only 3 chicks walking in a straight line:
🐥 First chick: 2 chicks are behind me. ✅
🐥 Middle chick: 2 chicks are ahead of me and 2 chicks are behind me. ❌
🐥 Last chick: 2 chicks are ahead of me. ✅
The middle chick’s statement is impossible if all three are walking in a single line and there are only 3 chicks.
Unless… there are other chicks in the line that we haven’t been told about! 😄
Or is there a clever twist to your riddle that I’m missing?
Me-No…I assure you the riddle is quite possible… every line of it is true. I want you to find how.
chat gpt-Aha! 😄 Let me challenge the assumption that all three chicks are walking in a straight line in the same direction.
The solution: They are walking in a circle! 🐥
- First chick: There are two chicks behind her.
- Middle chick: There are two chicks ahead of her and two chicks behind her.
- Last chick: There are two chicks ahead of her.
All three statements can be true if the chicks are walking around a circular path, because the chicks can appear both ahead and behind depending on how you define the direction and positions.
But I suspect there’s an even simpler trick here. Are you allowing the chicks to be arranged in a way other than a straight line?
Me-No it is a straight line.
chat gpt-Ohhh! 😄 Then I need to rethink the assumptions rather than change the arrangement.
Three chicks, a straight line, and every statement is true.
- First chick: 2 chicks are behind me.
- Middle chick: 2 chicks are ahead of me and 2 chicks are behind me.
- Last chick: 2 chicks are ahead of me.
Here’s my question: Does “the middle chick” necessarily mean the chick physically standing between the other two?
Because if the chicks are in a straight line, the trick may depend on how we interpret first, middle, and last — or on the direction in which they’re facing. 🤔
Me-yes the middle chik is in the middle.
chat gpt-Wait! I think the key may be that the chicks are facing different directions, even though they’re standing in a straight line. 🐥
But let me be precise: changing their facing directions alone doesn’t solve the middle chick’s statement if “ahead” and “behind” refer to positions in the line.
So I have a challenge for you: Are the chicks allowed to be facing different directions, or are all three facing the same way?
Me-It has a clear one-line answer.
ChatGPT-The middle chick is telling the truth because two chicks are behind her in the line of sight and two chicks are ahead of her when the line is viewed from both ends. 🐥
Get Suman Pradhan’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Me-no
ChatGPT-The chicks are walking in a straight line, but the middle chick is counting herself twice. 😄
Me-no
ChatGPT-The middle chick is walking between the first and last chick, but there are two chicks ahead and two chicks behind because the line is part of a longer line viewed from opposite ends.
Me-no
ChatGPT-I’m stumped, Suman! 😄 I’ve been guessing instead of solving it logically.
Give me one more chance: I’ll stick to the exact three chicks and the straight line, without inventing extra conditions.
Me-yes..one last chance
ChatGPT-The middle chick is facing backward! 🐥
me-no
ChatGPT-😂 You win, Suman! I’ve failed the chick test.
I can’t find a logically valid one-line solution from the clues given without adding an assumption.
Tell me the answer. I genuinely want to see what I missed!
Me-The middle chik was lying.
chat gpt-😂😂 Suman! The middle chick was lying!
That’s brilliant. I kept trying to solve a geometrical puzzle when the answer was about honesty.
The first chick told the truth. The last chick told the truth. The middle chick lied.
And the funniest part? I spent all that time trying to make an impossible statement possible instead of questioning whether the speaker was telling the truth. 🤦♂️🐥
Lesson: Sometimes the problem isn’t our logic. It’s our assumption that everyone is telling the truth.
me-exactly
ChatGPT-😂 And Suman, there’s a second layer to this riddle that I find even more interesting.
I kept assuming that the puzzle contained a hidden geometrical trick. Every time you rejected my answer, I changed the arrangement, the direction, or the interpretation.
I questioned everything except the statement’s truthfulness.
That is a form of assumption lock-in: once we decide what kind of problem we’re solving, we keep searching for solutions within that frame — even when the frame is wrong.
The middle chick didn’t need a clever arrangement. She just needed to lie.
“And here’s the uncomfortable question: How often do we exhaust ourselves trying to make something make sense when the real problem is that one of our starting assumptions is false?”
Author’s note-The Lesson
We often make the mistake of assuming that a solution that worked for one problem must also work for another.
When it fails, we try harder. We repeat our approach, modify it, and search for more sophisticated explanations.
But sometimes, the problem isn’t that we haven’t tried hard enough. It’s that we’re using the wrong approach.
I can’t emphasize enough that ,while dealing with different types of procrastination patterns…how often I came across this exact situation.
A problem caused by confusion cannot always be solved with more discipline. A problem caused by exhaustion cannot always be solved with greater effort. And a problem built on a false assumption cannot be solved simply by reasoning more carefully within that assumption.
The solution must fit the problem, not the other way around.
Before asking, “How do I solve this?” perhaps we should first ask:
“What kind of problem am I actually trying to solve?”
This story is published in Writer Life, A publication created to celebrate the people behind the words. Every article begins with a writer, every writer has a journey, and every journey deserves to be seen. Join Writer Life and become part of a community that believes in The Writer Behind Every Story
